Cited by 39Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Stimulant Dosing for Children With ADHD: A Medical Claims Analysis

Olfson, Mark, Marcus, Steven, Wan, George·2009·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To evaluate stimulant dosing patterns in the community treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method Claims data from U.S. managed care organizations (2000-2004) were analyzed for patients ages 6 to 12 years treated for ADHD with osmotically released oral system (OROS) methylphenidate (MPH; n = 3,815), immediate-release (IR) MPH (n = 1,960), mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR; n = 1,847), or IR MAS (n = 1,937), and who filled prescriptions covering at least 72 of the first 90 days of treatment. Results The mean initial and maximum dosages were 23.8 and 33.4 mg/day for OROS MPH, 14.8 and 21.8 mg/day for IR MPH, 12.7 and 17.4 mg/day for MAS XR, and 11.2 and 16.5 mg/day for IR MAS. Dose titration occurred in 51.8% (MAS XR) to 61.6% (IR MPH) of patients. Lower initial dose and three or more visits for the treatment of ADHD during the first 90 days of treatment were associated with dose titration. Maximum dose was significantly related to higher initial dose and titration for all four stimulants. For children treated with OROS MPH or IR MAS, treatment by a psychiatrist was significantly related to higher maximum dose. Conclusions Among children with ADHD who continue stimulants through the first 3 months of treatment, dosing in the community treatment of ADHD tends to be lower than doses used in clinical trials. When titration does occur, it is linked to lower initial dosing, clinical monitoring, higher final stimulant d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/chi.0b013e31818b1c8f

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olfson, M., Marcus, S., & Wan, G.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Olfson, Mark
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
51-59
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018245820
Cited by
39
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, mixed amphetamine salts, OROS methylphenidate, dose titration, children, managed care claims data, initial dose, maximum dose, psychiatric treatment, community-based treatment
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review