EGFR Exon 19 Deletion is Associated With Favorable Overall Survival After First-line Gefitinib Therapy in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation in exon 21 of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are both common mutations that predict a good response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the existence of clinically significant difference in sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors among different EGFR mutation subtypes is still a matter of debate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcome of 60 EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC patients who received first-line gefitinib therapy (250 mg/d) was retrospectively analyzed according to EGFR mutation subtypes. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the initiation of gefitinib therapy for all patients was 11 and 26 months, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that patients with exon 19 deletion (n=28) had significantly longer median PFS (20 vs. 8 mo, P=0.004) and OS (36 vs. 22 mo, P=0.001) compared with those with L858R mutation (n=25) and uncommon or dual mutations (n=7). Multivariate analysis revealed that exon 19 deletion (P=0.007) was an independent prognostic factor of favorable PFS, with an independent association with poor PFS of male sex (P=0.049). Exon 19 deletion was also independently associated with favorable OS (P<0.0001), whereas male sex (P=0.004) and primary metastatic disease (P=0.032) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS. CONCLUSIONS: The EGFR exon 19 deletion was associated with favorable PFS and OS in patients receiving first-line gefitinib treatment. The EGFR mutation subtype should be considered when making treatment decision or designing clinical trials for chemotherapy-naive, EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple studies have affirmed the favorable prognostic impact of exon 19 EGFR deletions compared with exon 21 L858R substitution.
“Multiple studies have affirmed the favorable prognostic impact of exon 19 EGFR deletions compared with exon 21 L858R amino acid substitution, although the molecular basis for this association has not been conclusively determined44, 45.”
From Co-occurring genomic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer biology and therapy (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
Screening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer
Rosell, R., Moran, T., Queralt, C., Porta, R., Cardenal, F., Camps, C., Majem, M., Lopez-Vivanco, G., Isla, D., Provencio, M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0904554 · Cited by 2,373 · see citing works
Yang, J. C.-H., Wu, Y.-L., Schuler, M., Sebastian, M., Popat, S., Yamamoto, N., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., O'Byrne, K., Feng, J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71173-8 · Cited by 1,574 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V., Martins, R. G., Spigel, D., Grunberg, S. M., Spira, A., Jänne, P. A., Joshi, V. A., McCollum, D., Evans, T. L., Muzikansky, A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.8494 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Mulloy, R., Ferrand, A., Kim, Y., Sordella, R., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A., Anderson, K. S., & Settleman, J. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4293 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Co-occurring genomic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer biology and therapy
Skoulidis, F., & Heymach, J. V. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0179-8 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
- Authors
- Choi, Y. W., Jeon, S. Y., Jeong, G. S., Lee, H. W., Jeong, S. H., Kang, S. Y., Park, J. S., Choi, J.-H., Koh, Y. W., Han, J. H., & Sheen, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Hematology-Oncology
- Department of Pathology
- Ajou University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Choi, Yong Won
- Jeon, So Yeon
- Jeong, Geum Sook
- Lee, Hyun Woo
- Jeong, Seong Hyun
- Kang, Seok Yun
- Park, Joon Seong
- Choi, Jin-Hyuk
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385-390
- ISSN
- 0277-3732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329284243
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Keywords
- EGFR exon 19 deletion, L858R mutation, gefitinib, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, first-line therapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, prognostic factors, sex differences, metastatic disease
- MeSH terms
- Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Exons, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Sequence Deletion, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review