Cited by 101Medication Adherence and ComplianceHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Importance of medication adherence in cardiovascular disease and the value of once-daily treatment regimens

Frishman, William H.·2007·Cardiology in Review

Abstract

An estimated 71 million individuals in the United States are currently diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD). If untreated, CVD conditions such as systemic hypertension, coronary artery disease, and heart failure will have potentially serious and often fatal outcomes. Numerous clinical trials have established a variety of evidence-based medications that are efficacious in the treatment of CVD. These drugs will be ineffective, however, if patients have trouble adhering to their prescribed regimens. In patients with hypertension or heart failure, or in those who have suffered a myocardial infarction, poor adherence to therapies has been linked to a variety of problems, including poor blood pressure control, rehospitalization, and increased healthcare resource utilization. Both the asymptomatic nature of some forms of CVD and the high pill burden associated with certain therapies have been linked to poor adherence. Reducing pill burden through the use of once-daily formulations has proven valuable in improving adherence to evidence-based therapies. This review will discuss the impact of adherence to prescribed therapies for CVD, outline common barriers to adherence, and demonstrate the value of once-daily dosing regimens for improved patient adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/crd.0b013e3180cabbe7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between hypertension/elevated lipids and reduced persistence likely reflects the asymptomatic nature of these conditions and the pill burden of managing multiple cardiovascular medications.

    “This likely reflects both the asymptomatic nature of these conditions—leading to patient perceptions of wellness without medication—and the pill burden associated with managing multiple cardiovascular medications.129”

    From Adherence to PCSK9 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [129]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frishman, W. H.
Affiliations
Westchester Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Frishman, William H.
Venue
Cardiology in Review
Published
2007-09
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
257-263
ISSN
1061-5377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983991661
Cited by
101
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiology in Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
medication adherence, cardiovascular disease, once-daily dosing, medication burden, hypertension, heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, barriers to adherence, blood pressure control, hospital readmission, healthcare resource utilization
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease, Delayed-Action Preparations, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Heart Failure, Humans, Hypertension, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Compliance, Patient Readmission, Tablets, Treatment Refusal, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review