Cited by 44Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

15q11.2 proximal imbalances associated with a diverse array of neuropsychiatric disorders and mild dysmorphic features

Abdelmoity, Ahmed T., LePichon, Jean-Baptiste, Nyp, Sarah S., Soden, Sarah E., Daniel, Carol A., Yu, Shihui·2012·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

Deletion within the proximal region of chromosome 15q11.2 between breakpoints 1 and 2 (BP1-BP2) has been proposed to be a risk factor for intellectual disability, seizure, and schizophrenia. However, the clinical significance of its reciprocal duplication is not clearly defined yet. We evaluated 1654 consecutive pediatric patients with various neurological disorders by high-resolution microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. We identified 21 patients carrying 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 deletion and 12 patients carrying 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 duplication in this cohort, which represent 1.27% (21/1,654) and 0.7% (12/1,654) of the patients analyzed, respectively. Approximately 87.5% of the patients carrying the deletion and 80% of the patients carrying the duplication have developmental delay or intellectual disability. Other recurrent clinical features in these patients include mild dysmorphic features, autistic spectrum disorders, and epilepsy. Our observations provide further evidence in favor of a strong association of 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 deletion with a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. The diversity of clinical findings in these patients expands the phe-notypic spectrum of individuals carrying the deletion. In addition, possible etiological effects of 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 duplication in neuropsychiatric disorders are proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0b013e31826052ae

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 10/29 (35%) of individuals with the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion inherited their deletion from an abnormal parent.

    “The review of literature from six published reports summarized by Cafferkey et al. [18] regarding information on the inheritance of the 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 microdeletion indicates that 22/43 (51%) of individuals with the microdeletion, where parental data were available, inherited their deletion from an apparently healthy parent while 10/29 (35%) of individuals inherited their deletion from an abnorma”

    From The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Abdelmoity et al. found that 21% or 1.27% of 1654 consecutive pediatric patients with neurological disorders carried a 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 deletion.

    “Later, Abdelmoity et al. [17] reported a cohort of 1654 consecutive pediatric patients presenting with a range of neurological disorders and found that 21% or 1.27% of the patients carried a 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 deletion.”

    From The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

  • 22/43 (51%) of individuals with the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion, where parental data were available, inherited their deletion from an apparently healthy parent.

    “The review of literature from six published reports summarized by Cafferkey et al. [18] regarding information on the inheritance of the 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 microdeletion indicates that 22/43 (51%) of individuals with the microdeletion, where parental data were available, inherited their deletion from an apparently healthy parent while 10/29 (35%) of individuals inherited their deletion from an abnorma”

    From The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

  • 87.5% of patients with the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 deletion in Abdelmoity et al. had developmental delay or intellectual disability.

    “They found that 87.5% of the patients with the deletion had developmental delay or intellectual disability.”

    From The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Zody, 2006, . Analysis of the DNA sequence and duplication history of human chromosome 15., Nature, 440, 671, 10.1038/nature04601 · DOI
  2. Chai, 2003, . Identification of four highly conserved genes between breakpoint hotspots BP1 and BP2 of the Prader-WilliAngelman syndromes deletion region that have undergone evolutionary transposition mediated by flanking duplicons., Am J Hum Genet, 73, 898, 10.1086/378816 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Butler, 2004, Behavioral differences among subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome and type I or type II deletion and maternal disomy., Pediatrics, 113, 565, 10.1542/peds.113.3.565 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hartley, 2005, Maladaptive behaviors and risk factors among the genetic subtypes of Prader-Willi syndrome., Am J Med Genet A, 136, 140, 10.1002/ajmg.a.30771 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sahoo, 2006, . Microarray based comparative genomic hybridization testing in deletion bearing patients with Angelman syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlations., J Med Genet, 43, 512, 10.1136/jmg.2005.036913 · DOI
  6. Kirov, 2009, ; International Schizophrenia Consortium; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Support for the involvement of large copy number variants in the pathogens is of schizophrenia., Hum Mo I Genet, 18, 1497, 10.1093/hmg/ddp043 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mefford, 2009, . A method for rapid, targeted CNV genotyping identifies rare variants associated with neurocognitive disease., Genome Res, 19, 1579, 10.1101/gr.094987.109 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Burnside, 2011, . Microdeletionmicroduplication of proximal 15q11.2 between BP1 and BP2: a susceptibility region for neurological dysfunction including developmental and language delay., Hum Genet, 130, 517, 10.1007/s00439-011-0970-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. van der Zwaag, 2010, . A cosegregating microduplication of chromosome 15q11.2 pinpoints two risk genes for autism spectrum disorder., Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 153B, 960, 10.1002/ajmg.b.31055 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Reed, 2005, . A novel NIPA1 mutation associated with a pure form of autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia., Neurogenetics, 6, 79, 10.1007/s10048-004-0209-9 · DOI
  11. Nishimura, 2007, . Genome-wide expression profiling of lymphoblastoid cell lines distinguishes different forms of autism and reveals shared pathways., Hum Mol Genet, 16, 1682, 10.1093/hmg/ddm116 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Nowicki, 2007, . The Prader-Willi phenotype of fragile X syndrome., J Dev Behav Pediatr, 28, 133, 10.1097/01.DBP.0000267563.18952.c9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. De Rubeis, 2011, Regulation of molecular pathways in the Fragile X Syndrome: insights into Autism Spectrum Disorders., J Neurodev Disord, 3, 257, 10.1007/s11689-011-9087-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Nagase, 2001, Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. XXI. The complete sequences of 60 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins., DNA Res, 8, 179, 10.1093/dnares/8.4.179 · DOI
  15. Francois, 2004, . Behavioural disorders induced by external globus pallidus dysfunction in primates II. Anatomical study., Brain, 127, 2055, 10.1093/brain/awh239 · DOI
  16. Grabli, 2004, . Behavioural disorders induced by external globus pallidus dysfunction in primates: I. Behavioural study., Brain, 127, 2039, 10.1093/brain/awh220 · DOI
  17. Yu, 2009, Validation of the Agilent 244K oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization platform for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis., Am J Clin Pathol, 132, 349, 10.1309/AJCP1BOUTWF6ERYS · DOI
  18. Yu, 2009, Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for the verification of genomic imbalances detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization., Genet Test Mol Biomarkers, 13, 751, 10.1089/gtmb.2009.0056 · DOI
  19. 2008, Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia., Nature, 455, 237, 10.1038/nature07239 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Burbach, 2009, Contact in the genetics of autism and schizophrenia., Trends Neurosci, 32, 69, 10.1016/j.tins.2008.11.002 · DOI
  21. Shen, 2010, ; Autism Consortium Clinical GeneticsDNA Diagnostics Collaboration. Clinical genetic testing for patients with autism spectrum disorders., Pediatrics, 125, e727, 10.1542/peds.2009-1684 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Tsang, 2009, . The hereditary spastic paraplegia proteins NIPA1, spastin and spartin are inhibitors of mammalian BMP signalling., Hum Mol Genet, 18, 3805, 10.1093/hmg/ddp324 · DOI
  23. Xiong, 2009, In vivo analysis of the functions of gamma-tubulin-complex proteins., J Cell Sci, 122, 4218, 10.1242/jcs.059196 · DOI
  24. Scoles, 2011, Increased copy number for methylated maternal 15q duplications leads to changes in gene and protein expression in human cortical samples., Mol Autism, 2, 19, 10.1186/2040-2392-2-19 · DOI
  25. Stewart, 2011, High frequency of known copy number abnormalities and maternal duplication 15q11-q13 in patients with combined schizophrenia and epilepsy., BMC Med Genet, 12, 154, 10.1186/1471-2350-12-154 · DOI
  26. Ingason, 2011, . Maternally derived microduplications at 15q11-q13: implication of imprinted genes in psychotic illness., Am J Psychiatry, 168, 408, 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09111660 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdelmoity, A. T., LePichon, J.-B., Nyp, S. S., Soden, S. E., Daniel, C. A., & Yu, S.
Affiliations
  • Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Abdelmoity, Ahmed T.
  • LePichon, Jean-Baptiste
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2012-09
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
570-576
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987957217
Cited by
44
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
15q11.2, intellectual disability, developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, neuropsychiatric disorders, dysmorphic features, phenotypic spectrum, pediatric patients
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Intellectual Disability, Nervous System Diseases, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Chromosome Duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review