Cited by 485Diverticular Disease and ComplicationsAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementGastrointestinal disorders and treatments

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Left-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis

Open access
Hall, Jason, Hardiman, Karin, Lee, Sang, Lightner, Amy, Stocchi, Luca, Paquette, Ian M., Steele, Scott R., Feingold, Daniel L. +1 more·2020·Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) is dedicated to ensuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is composed of society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. METHODOLOGY These guidelines are constructed on the platform of the previously published Practice Parameters for the Treatment of Sigmoid Diverticulitis published by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) in 2014.1 A systematic search was conducted under the guidance of an information services librarian. This search strategy is outlined under the search appendices (see Supplemental Digital Content, https://links.lww.com/DCR/B209). The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 1, 2013, until October 26, 2019. Relevant manuscripts identified by individual authors were also included. Key word combinations using the MeSH terms including “Diverticulitis,” “Diverticulosis,” “Diverticular,” “Colonic,” “Colon Diverticulosis,” “Surgery,” “Medical Therapy,” “Antibiotics,” “Probiotics,” “Laparoscopic Lavage,” “Mesalamine,” “Rifaximin,” and “Surgery” were performed. The search was limited to English language abstracts with human subjects. A directed search of references embedded in the candidate publications was also performed. Emphasis was placed on prospective trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. Peer-reviewed observational studies and retrospective studies were included when higher-quality evidence was insufficient. In brief, a total of 4885 unique journal titles were identified. Initial review of the search results led to the exclusion of 4223 titles based on irrelevance of the title or because they consisted of a case report, letter to the editor, or nonsystematic review. A review of the remaining 662 titles included assessment of the full-length articles. This led to exclusion of an additional 494 titles for which similar but higher-level evidence was available. The remaining 168 titles were considered for grading of the recommendations (Fig. 1). The final source material used was evaluated for the methodological quality, the evidence base was examined, and a treatment guideline was formulated by the subcommittee for this guideline. The final grade of recommendation and level of evidence for each statement were determined using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system (Table 1).2 When agreement was incomplete regarding the evidence base or treatment guideline, consensus from the committee chair, vice chair, and 2 assigned reviewers determined the outcome. Members of the ASCRS Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee worked in joint production of these guidelines from inception to publication. Recommendations formulated by the subcommittee were reviewed by the entire Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. The submission was peer-reviewed by Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and the final recommendations were approved by the ASCRS Executive Council. In general, each ASCRS Clinical Practice Guideline is updated every 5 years. No funding was received for preparing this guideline and the authors have declared no competing interests related to this material.TABLE 1.: The GRADE System: grading recommendationsFIGURE 1.: PRISMA literature search flow sheet.The terms uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis, symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD), and recurrent diverticulitis are used throughout this document. For purposes of this guideline, complicated diverticulitis is defined as diverticulitis associated with uncontained, free perforation with a systemic inflammatory response, fistula, abscess, stricture, or obstruction. Micro-perforation with small amounts of contained, extraluminal gas, in the absence of a systemic inflammatory response, is not considered complicated diverticulitis. Uncomplicated diver

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001679

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All guidelines recommended physical examinations as an essential part of the diagnostic process, preferably as the first action.

    “All guidelines recommended physical examinations as an essential part of the diagnostic process, preferably as the first action.”

    From Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    In “Initial Evaluation of Acute Diverticulitis” (recommendation 1; page not supplied), this guideline recommends a physical examination as part of the initial evaluation. It does not establish what all guidelines recommend or say that the examination should preferably be the first action. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, J., Hardiman, K., Lee, S., Lightner, A., Stocchi, L., Paquette, I. M., Steele, S. R., Feingold, D. L., & Prepared on behalf of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Feingold, Daniel L.
Venue
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Published
2020-06
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
728-747
ISSN
0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022871146
Cited by
485
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 24
FWCI
55.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Keywords
sigmoid diverticulitis, diverticulosis, antibiotics, probiotics, rifaximin, 5-aminosalicylic acid, laparoscopic lavage, medical therapy, surgical treatment, diverticulitis recurrence, diverticulitis complications, diverticulitis surgery
MeSH terms
Rifaximin, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Colorectal Surgery, Diverticulitis, Colonic, Health Workforce, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, United States, Prevalence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Elective Surgical Procedures, Paracentesis, Disease Management, Mesalamine, Probiotics, Observational Studies as Topic, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review