The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Left-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis
Open accessAbstract
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) is dedicated to ensuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is composed of society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. METHODOLOGY These guidelines are constructed on the platform of the previously published Practice Parameters for the Treatment of Sigmoid Diverticulitis published by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) in 2014.1 A systematic search was conducted under the guidance of an information services librarian. This search strategy is outlined under the search appendices (see Supplemental Digital Content, https://links.lww.com/DCR/B209). The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 1, 2013, until October 26, 2019. Relevant manuscripts identified by individual authors were also included. Key word combinations using the MeSH terms including “Diverticulitis,” “Diverticulosis,” “Diverticular,” “Colonic,” “Colon Diverticulosis,” “Surgery,” “Medical Therapy,” “Antibiotics,” “Probiotics,” “Laparoscopic Lavage,” “Mesalamine,” “Rifaximin,” and “Surgery” were performed. The search was limited to English language abstracts with human subjects. A directed search of references embedded in the candidate publications was also performed. Emphasis was placed on prospective trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. Peer-reviewed observational studies and retrospective studies were included when higher-quality evidence was insufficient. In brief, a total of 4885 unique journal titles were identified. Initial review of the search results led to the exclusion of 4223 titles based on irrelevance of the title or because they consisted of a case report, letter to the editor, or nonsystematic review. A review of the remaining 662 titles included assessment of the full-length articles. This led to exclusion of an additional 494 titles for which similar but higher-level evidence was available. The remaining 168 titles were considered for grading of the recommendations (Fig. 1). The final source material used was evaluated for the methodological quality, the evidence base was examined, and a treatment guideline was formulated by the subcommittee for this guideline. The final grade of recommendation and level of evidence for each statement were determined using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system (Table 1).2 When agreement was incomplete regarding the evidence base or treatment guideline, consensus from the committee chair, vice chair, and 2 assigned reviewers determined the outcome. Members of the ASCRS Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee worked in joint production of these guidelines from inception to publication. Recommendations formulated by the subcommittee were reviewed by the entire Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. The submission was peer-reviewed by Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and the final recommendations were approved by the ASCRS Executive Council. In general, each ASCRS Clinical Practice Guideline is updated every 5 years. No funding was received for preparing this guideline and the authors have declared no competing interests related to this material.TABLE 1.: The GRADE System: grading recommendationsFIGURE 1.: PRISMA literature search flow sheet.The terms uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis, symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD), and recurrent diverticulitis are used throughout this document. For purposes of this guideline, complicated diverticulitis is defined as diverticulitis associated with uncontained, free perforation with a systemic inflammatory response, fistula, abscess, stricture, or obstruction. Micro-perforation with small amounts of contained, extraluminal gas, in the absence of a systemic inflammatory response, is not considered complicated diverticulitis. Uncomplicated diver
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All guidelines recommended physical examinations as an essential part of the diagnostic process, preferably as the first action.
“All guidelines recommended physical examinations as an essential part of the diagnostic process, preferably as the first action.”
From Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
In “Initial Evaluation of Acute Diverticulitis” (recommendation 1; page not supplied), this guideline recommends a physical examination as part of the initial evaluation. It does not establish what all guidelines recommend or say that the examination should preferably be the first action. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Peery, A. F., Crockett, S. D., Murphy, C. C., Lund, J. L., Dellon, E. S., Williams, J. L., Jensen, E. T., Shaheen, N. J., Barritt, A. S., Lieber, S. R., et al. (2019) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.063 · Cited by 1,619 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making
Hager, P., Jungmann, F., Holland, R., Bhagat, K., Hubrecht, I., Knauer, M., Vielhauer, J., Makowski, M., Braren, R., Kaissis, G., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03097-1 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
“All models struggle to follow the provided instructions (Extended Data Fig.”
- Authors
- Hall, J., Hardiman, K., Lee, S., Lightner, A., Stocchi, L., Paquette, I. M., Steele, S. R., Feingold, D. L., & Prepared on behalf of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feingold, Daniel L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 728-747
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022871146
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 88 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 24
- FWCI
- 55.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diverticular Disease and Complications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- sigmoid diverticulitis, diverticulosis, antibiotics, probiotics, rifaximin, 5-aminosalicylic acid, laparoscopic lavage, medical therapy, surgical treatment, diverticulitis recurrence, diverticulitis complications, diverticulitis surgery
- MeSH terms
- Rifaximin, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Colorectal Surgery, Diverticulitis, Colonic, Health Workforce, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, United States, Prevalence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Elective Surgical Procedures, Paracentesis, Disease Management, Mesalamine, Probiotics, Observational Studies as Topic, Surgeons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review