The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013–2014
Abstract
Background: Patch testing is the most important diagnostic tool for the assessment of allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: This study documents the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch testing results from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014. Methods: At 13 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a screening series of 70 allergens. Data were manually verified and entered into a central database. Descriptive frequencies were calculated, and trends were analyzed using χ 2 test. Results: A total of 4871 patients were tested. There were 3255 patients (66.8%) who had at least 1 positive reaction and 2412 patients (49.5%) who were ultimately determined to have a primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. A total of 434 patients (8.9%) had occupationally related skin disease. There were 9726 positive allergic reactions. Compared with the previous reporting periods (2011–2012 and 2001–2012, including at least three 2-year cycles), positive reaction rates for the top 25 screening allergens statistically increased for 2 allergens: methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (6.4%; risk ratios, 1.26 [1.07–1.50] and 2.08 [1.84–2.37]) and hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2.6%; risk ratios, 1.34 [1.02–1.76] and 1.23 [1.00–1.51]). Methylisothiazolinone, which was added to the screening series for this 2013–2014 cycle, had the third highest positive reaction rate of allergens tested (10.9%). Four other newly added allergen preparations—formaldehyde 2% (7%), diphenylguanidine (3.8%), propylene glycol 100% (2.8%), and benzophenone-4 (2.1%)—all had reaction rates greater than 2%. Twenty-one percent of tested patients had at least 1 relevant allergic reaction to an allergen not on the NACDG series; 14.6% of these were occupationally related. The T.R.U.E. TEST (SmartPractice Denmark, Hillerød, Denmark) would have hypothetically missed one quarter to one third of reactions detected by the NACDG screening series. Conclusions: These results confirm that the epidemic of sensitivity to methylisothiazolinone previously documented in Europe is also occurring in North America. Patch testing with allergens beyond a standard screening tray is necessary for the complete evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational allergic contact dermatitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Further Evidence of the Methylisothiazolinone Epidemic
Madsen, J. T., & Andersen, K. E. (2014) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.12217 · Cited by 31
Cited by
Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Alinaghi, F., Bennike, N. H., Egeberg, A., Thyssen, J. P., & Johansen, J. D. (2019) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.13119 · Cited by 373
Xu, S., Kwa, M., Lohman, M. E., Evers-Meltzer, R., & Silverberg, J. I. (2017) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3046 · Cited by 90
Natural Does Not Mean Safe—The Dirt on Clean Beauty Products
Rubin, C. B., & Brod, B. (2019) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.2724 · Cited by 58
Alkyl Glucosides in Contact Dermatitis
Loranger, C., Alfalah, M., Ferrier Le Bouedec, M.-C., & Sasseville, D. (2017) · Dermatitis® · doi:10.1097/der.0000000000000240 · Cited by 45
Self-citationLidén, C., & White, I. R. (2024) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.14523 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- DeKoven, J. G., Warshaw, E. M., Belsito, D. V., Sasseville, D., Maibach, H. I., Taylor, J. S., Marks, J. G., Fowler, J. F., Mathias, C. G. T., DeLeo, V. A., Pratt, M. D., Zirwas, M. J., & Zug, K. A.
- Venue
- Dermatitis®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-46
- ISSN
- 1710-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-5220
- OpenAlex
- W2532220783
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013–2014. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/der.0000000000000225
- The paper
- DeKoven, J. G., Warshaw, E. M., Belsito, D. V., Sasseville, D., Maibach, H. I., Taylor, J. S., Marks, J. G., Fowler, J. F., Mathias, C. G. T., DeLeo, V. A., Pratt, M. D., Zirwas, M. J., & Zug, K. A. (2017). North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013–2014. Dermatitis®. https://doi.org/10.1097/der.0000000000000225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.