Cited by 31Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDermatology and Skin DiseasesDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Positive patch test reaction in a patient taking dupilumab

Puza, Charles J., Atwater, Amber Reck·2018·Dermatitis®

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/der.0000000000000346

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puza, C. J., & Atwater, A. R.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Atwater, Amber Reck
Venue
Dermatitis®
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
89-89
ISSN
  • 1710-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-5220
OpenAlex
W2790028212
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
dupilumab, patch testing, drug-induced contact dermatitis, adverse drug reactions, biologic therapy, allergic contact dermatitis
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatologic Agents, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Immunocompromised Host, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review