Cited by 69Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Assessment of Skin Physiology Change and Safety After Intradermal Injections With Botulinum Toxin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Pilot Study in Rosacea Patients With Facial Erythema

Kim, Min Jung, Kim, Jin Hee, Cheon, Hye In, Hur, Min Seok, Han, Song Hee, Lee, Yang Won, Choe, Yong Beom, Ahn, Kyu Joong·2019·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin (BTX) has been used cosmetically with good clinical efficacy and tolerable safety. OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intradermal BTX in patients with rosacea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four participants were enrolled and randomly given intradermal injections of BTX and normal saline in both cheeks. Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) score, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), melanin content, erythema index, elasticity, and sebum secretions were evaluated at baseline and 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: On the BTX-treated side, the CEA score significantly decreased and the GAIS score significantly increased. The erythema index decreased at Weeks 4 and 8. Skin elasticity was improved at Weeks 2 and 4 and skin hydration, at Weeks 2, 4, and 8. However, TEWL and sebum secretion did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION: Intradermal BTX injections reduced erythema and rejuvenated the skin effectively and safely in patients with rosacea.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dss.0000000000001819

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M. J., Kim, J. H., Cheon, H. I., Hur, M. S., Han, S. H., Lee, Y. W., Choe, Y. B., & Ahn, K. J.
Affiliations
Konkuk University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Min Jung
  • Kim, Jin Hee
  • Cheon, Hye In
  • Hur, Min Seok
  • Han, Song Hee
  • Lee, Yang Won
  • Choe, Yong Beom
  • Ahn, Kyu Joong
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2019-09
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
1155-1162
ISSN
  • 1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4725
OpenAlex
W2912791071
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
botulinum toxin, intradermal injection, rosacea, facial erythema, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, skin elasticity, sebum production, melanin content, skin rejuvenation
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Elasticity, Erythema, Esthetics, Facial Dermatoses, Female, Humans, Injections, Intradermal, Male, Middle Aged, Neuromuscular Agents, Pilot Projects, Rejuvenation, Rosacea, Sebum, Skin, Botulinum Toxins, Type A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review