Cited by 11Hair Growth and DisordersDermatologic Treatments and Researchmelanin and skin pigmentation

Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost 0.01% for the Treatment of Eyebrow Hypotrichosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study

Suchonwanit, Poonkiat, Chanasumon, Nongsak, Sriphojanart, Tueboon·2019·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eyebrow hypotrichosis is an important dermatological problem. However, there is no standard treatment. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.01% for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Although bimatoprost 0.03% has been studied previously, this is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.01% for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis. A randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled trial was conducted in 40 patients. All patients were randomized to receive bimatoprost 0.01% or placebo vehicle, once daily, for 6 months. The primary outcome was improvement in eyebrow density and diameter. Additional outcomes were the improvement in clinical assessments and safety evaluation. RESULTS: Compared to the vehicle group, bimatoprost 0.01% significantly increased mean eyebrow hair density, eyebrow hair diameter, and clinical assessments (p < .001) in the drug group. Patients' satisfaction score was higher for the drug group than the vehicle group (p < .05). Adverse effects of the treatment were minimal and similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Bimatoprost 0.01% was found to be superior to a placebo for eyebrow enhancement. Bimatoprost 0.01% can be considered effective, safe, and well-tolerated for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dss.0000000000001944

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Suchonwanit, P., Chanasumon, N., & Sriphojanart, T.
Affiliations
Mahidol University (TH)
Corresponding author
Suchonwanit, Poonkiat
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2019-12
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
1549-1556
ISSN
  • 1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4725
OpenAlex
W2924455381
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
bimatoprost, prostanoid therapy, cosmetic procedures, drug safety, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Bimatoprost, Administration, Topical, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Eyebrows, Female, Humans, Hypotrichosis, Male, Middle Aged, Ophthalmic Solutions, Placebos, Thailand, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review