Low-Level Laser and LED Therapy in Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background Low-level laser/LED therapy (LLLT) has been described as a treatment option for alopecia, but no study has comprehensively reviewed its efficacy in multiple alopecia types. Objective To review and evaluate LLLT for various alopecia types. Materials and methods A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted to identify studies assessing the effect of LLLT on patients diagnosed with alopecia. Prespecified outcome measure was the change in hair density. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the standardized mean difference in hair density before and after LLLT compared with placebo. Results Thirty-eight studies were included that described 3,098 patients with androgenetic alopecia (2,930/3,098), scarring alopecia (49/3,098), alopecia areata (50/3,098), telogen effluvium (17/3,098), and chemotherapy-induced alopecia (32/3,098). The mean change in hair density increased significantly in androgenetic alopecia patients after LLLT for 4 to 26 weeks compared with placebo ( 20 weeks: SMD = 1.44; 95% CI [0.97-1.91]; p = .000; I 2 = 80.81%). Change in hair density was reported in 5 studies evaluating other alopecia types; however, statistical information was insufficient for meta-analysis. Conclusion LLLT is a promising treatment option for patients with androgenetic alopecia, but future studies are needed to better understand its efficacy in other alopecia types.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The meta-analysis by Adil and Godwin reported a significant increase in hair density (+17.66 hairs/cm2) with low-level laser therapy for androgenetic alopecia.
“with the meta-analysis by Adil and Godwin 38 reporting a significant increase in hair density (+17.66 hairs/cm²)”
From A systematic appraisal of emerging alternative therapies in men’s health and wellness (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Perez, S. M., Vattigunta, M., Kelly, C., & Eber, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perez, Sofia M.
- Venue
- Dermatologic Surgery
- Published
- 2024-10-15
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-183
- ISSN
- 1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4725
- OpenAlex
- W4403406319
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Keywords
- low-level laser therapy, LED therapy, hair loss, androgenetic alopecia, hair density, alopecia areata, scarring alopecia, telogen effluvium, chemotherapy-induced alopecia, hair regrowth
- MeSH terms
- Alopecia, Hair, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Low-Level Light Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review