Cited by 26

Use of Scandinavian Moist Smokeless Tobacco (Snus) and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation

Hergens, Maria-Pia, Galanti, Rosaria, Hansson, Jenny, Fredlund, Peeter, Ahlbom, Anders, Alfredsson, Lars, Bellocco, Rino, Eriksson, Marie +8 more·2014·Epidemiology

Abstract

Background Snus is a smokeless tobacco product, widely used among Swedish men and increasingly so elsewhere. There is debate as to whether snus is an acceptable "harm-reduction" tobacco product. Since snus use delivers a dose of nicotine equivalent to cigarettes, and has been implicated in cardiac arrhythmia because of associations with sudden cardiovascular death, a relation with atrial fibrillation is plausible and important to investigate. Methods To assess the relation between use of snus and risk of atrial fibrillation, we carried out a pooled analysis of 7 prospective Swedish cohort studies. In total, 274,882 men, recruited between 1978 and 2004, were followed via the National Patient Register for atrial fibrillation. Primary analyses were restricted to 127,907 never-smokers. Relative risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression. Results The prevalence of snus use was 25% among never-smokers. During follow-up, 3,069 cases of atrial fibrillation were identified. The pooled relative risk of atrial fibrillation was 1.07 (95% confidence interval = 0.97-1.19) in current snus users, compared with nonusers. Conclusion Findings from this large national pooling project indicate that snus use is unlikely to confer any important increase in risk of atrial fibrillation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000000169

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hergens, M.-P., Galanti, R., Hansson, J., Fredlund, P., Ahlbom, A., Alfredsson, L., Bellocco, R., Eriksson, M., Fransson, E. I., Hallqvist, J., Jansson, J.-H., Knutsson, A., Pedersen, N., Lagerros, Y. T., Östergren, P.-O., & Magnusson, C.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2014-11
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
872-876
ISSN
1044-3983
Cited by
26
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review