The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Lung Cancer Risk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most studies on the association between lung cancer and air pollution have investigated mortality. There have been few studies of lung cancer incidence. METHODS: We used data from the ongoing Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer for 114,378 subjects with follow-up from September 1986 to December 1997. Exposure to black smoke, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulate matter < or =2.5 microm (PM2.5) and traffic intensity variables (intensity on nearest road, intensity in a 100 m buffer, and an indicator variable for living close to a major road) were estimated at the home address. We conducted Cox proportional hazard analyses in the full cohort adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, and area-level socioeconomic status. We also carried out case-cohort analyses using more potential confounders on a subset of study participants for whom complete information from the baseline questionnaire had been processed. RESULTS: Adjusted analyses included 1940 cases for the full cohort and 1295 cases for the case-cohort analysis. Relative risks (RRs) for the overall air pollution concentrations were slightly below unity, and for the traffic variables RRs were slightly elevated. Risk was elevated among people who never smoked cigarettes (40,114 participants; 252 cases), with RRs of 1.47 (95% confidence interval = 1.01-2.16) for overall black smoke concentration, 1.11 (0.88-1.41) for traffic intensity on nearest road, and 1.55 (0.98-2.43) for living near a major road. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence for an association of exposure to black smoke and traffic with lung cancer incidence in people who had never smoked. No associations were found for the full cohort, or for other categories of smoking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eeftens, M., Beelen, R., de Hoogh, K., Bellander, T., Cesaroni, G., Cirach, M., Declercq, C., Dėdelė, A., Dons, E., de Nazelle, A., et al. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es301948k · Cited by 1,214
Self-citationLepeule, J., Laden, F., Dockery, D., & Schwartz, J. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104660 · Cited by 983
Eeftens, M., Tsai, M.-Y., Ampe, C., Anwander, B., Beelen, R., Bellander, T., Cesaroni, G., Cirach, M., Cyrys, J., de Hoogh, K., et al. (2012) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.038 · Cited by 492
Self-citationAirborne Particle Exposure and Extrinsic Skin Aging
Vierkötter, A., Schikowski, T., Ranft, U., Sugiri, D., Matsui, M., Krämer, U., & Krutmann, J. (2010) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2010.204 · Cited by 473
Environmental influences on skin aging and ethnic-specific manifestations
Vierkötter, A., & Krutmann, J. (2012) · Dermato-Endocrinology · doi:10.4161/derm.19858 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Beelen, R., Hoek, G., van den Brandt, P. A., Goldbohm, R. A., Fischer, P., Schouten, L. J., Armstrong, B., & Brunekreef, B.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 702-710
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090726311
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Lung Cancer Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ede.0b013e318181b3ca
- The paper
- Beelen, R., Hoek, G., van den Brandt, P. A., Goldbohm, R. A., Fischer, P., Schouten, L. J., Armstrong, B., & Brunekreef, B. (2008). Long-Term Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Lung Cancer Risk. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e318181b3ca
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.