The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.
Open accessAbstract
Overadjustment is defined inconsistently. This term is meant to describe control (eg, by regression adjustment, stratification, or restriction) for a variable that either increases net bias or decreases precision without affecting bias. We define overadjustment bias as control for an intermediate variable (or a descending proxy for an intermediate variable) on a causal path from exposure to outcome. We define unnecessary adjustment as control for a variable that does not affect bias of the causal relation between exposure and outcome but may affect its precision. We use causal diagrams and an empirical example (the effect of maternal smoking on neonatal mortality) to illustrate and clarify the definition of overadjustment bias, and to distinguish overadjustment bias from unnecessary adjustment. Using simulations, we quantify the amount of bias associated with overadjustment. Moreover, we show that this bias is based on a different causal structure from confounding or selection biases. Overadjustment bias is not a finite sample bias, while inefficiencies due to control for unnecessary variables are a function of sample size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To ensure that we did not improperly adjust for mediating variables, 22 we used covariates measured at wave 1 instead of wave 2.”
From Associations Between Time Spent Using Social Media and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems Among US Youth. (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Causal Diagrams for Epidemiologic Research
Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199901000-00008 · Cited by 3,728
Air Pollution and Hospital Admissions for Heart Disease in Eight U.S. Counties
Schwartz, J. D. (1999) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199901000-00005 · Cited by 3,045
A structural approach to selection bias
Hernán, M. A., Hernández-Díaz, S., & Robins, J. M. (2004) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43 · Cited by 2,844
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355
Porta, M. (2026) · doi:10.1093/acref/9780197663639.001.0001 · Cited by 2,175
Martuza, V. R., & Kenny, D. A. (1981) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1175080 · Cited by 2,034
Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects
Robins, J. M., & Greenland, S. (1992) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199203000-00013 · Cited by 1,793
Maternal Pesticide Exposure from Multiple Sources and Selected Congenital Anomalies
Shaw, G. M., Wasserman, C. R., O’Malley, C. D., Nelson, V. E., & Jackson, R. J. (1999) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199901000-00011 · Cited by 1,783
Hernan, M. A. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 · Cited by 1,445 · cited 3×
“A set of rules for causal diagrams are succinctly described by Greenland et al10 and in the appendix of Hernan et al.11 Briefly, causal diagrams link variables by singleheaded (ie, directed) arrows that represent direct causal effects.”
BackgroundInfluentialCausation and Causal Inference in Epidemiology
Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (2005) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.059204 · Cited by 1,260 · cited 1×
“” One also finds reference to the term overadjustment in settings with unnecessary control for variables.(7) In summary, overadjustment sometimes means control (eg, by regression adjustment, stratification, restriction) for a variable that (a) increases rather than decreases net bias or (b) affects precision without a…”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission
Livingston, G., Huntley, J., Liu, K. Y., Costafreda, S. G., Selbæk, G., Alladi, S., Ames, D., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Brayne, C., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01296-0 · Cited by 3,860
Early-life exposure to EDCs: role in childhood obesity and neurodevelopment
Braun, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.186 · Cited by 965
Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider
Cole, S. R., Platt, R. W., Schisterman, E. F., Chu, H., Westreich, D., Richardson, D., & Poole, C. (2010) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyp334 · Cited by 796
Self-citationThe impact of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review
Park, M. H., Falconer, C., Viner, R., & Kinra, S. (2012) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2012.01015.x · Cited by 739
Lederer, D. J., Bell, S. C., Branson, R. D., Chalmers, J. D., Marshall, R., Maslove, D. M., Ost, D. E., Punjabi, N. M., Schatz, M., Smyth, A. R., et al. (2019) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201808-564ps · Cited by 715
Metadata
- Authors
- Schisterman, E. F., Cole, S. R., & Platt, R. W.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Schisterman, Enrique F.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 488-495
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2744485
- OpenAlex
- W2004722883
- Cited by
- 2,096
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 298 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 154 · 2018: 117 · 2017: 130 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 27.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R03AI071763)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Z01HD008761)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- intermediate variables, confounding, selection bias, causal graphs, maternal smoking, neonatal mortality, regression adjustment, stratification, sample size
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Population Dynamics, Smoking, Models, Statistical, Epidemiologic Research Design, Bias, Causality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
