Cited by 501Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsHereditary Neurological Disorders

Clinical and genetic aspects of neurofibromatosis 1

Open access
Jett, Kimberly, Friedman, Jan M.·2010·Genetics in Medicine

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis 1 is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple café-au-lait spots, axillary and inguinal freckling, multiple cutaneous neurofibromas, and iris Lisch nodules. Learning disabilities are present in at least 50% of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. Less common but potentially more serious manifestations include plexiform neurofibromas, optic nerve and other central nervous system gliomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, scoliosis, tibial dysplasia, and vasculopathy. The diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 is usually based on clinical findings. Neurofibromatosis 1, one of the most common Mendelian disorders, is caused by heterozygous mutations of the NF1 gene. Almost one half of all affected individuals have de novo mutations. Molecular genetic testing is available clinically but is infrequently needed for diagnosis. Disease management includes referral to specialists for treatment of complications involving the eye, central or peripheral nervous system, cardiovascular system, spine, or long bones. Surgery to remove both benign and malignant tumors or to correct skeletal manifestations is sometimes warranted. Annual physical examination by a physician familiar with the disorder is recommended. Other recommendations include ophthalmologic examinations annually in children and less frequently in adults, regular developmental assessment in children, regular blood pressure monitoring, and magnetic resonance imaging for follow-up of clinicall…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/gim.0b013e3181bf15e3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 222 · Cited by 501

Authors
Jett, K., & Friedman, J. M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Jett, Kimberly
Venue
Genetics in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066278568
Cited by
501
References
222
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 32
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
neurofibromatosis type 1, NF1 gene, café-au-lait spots, plexiform neurofibroma, Lisch nodules, learning disabilities, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, optic nerve glioma, scoliosis, tibial dysplasia, de novo mutations, molecular genetic testing, disease management, surveillance (medicine)
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bone and Bones, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Eye Diseases, Headache, Humans, Intelligence, Learning Disabilities, Neurofibromatosis 1, Genes, Neurofibromatosis 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review