Cited by 79Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolomics in hypertension

Open access

Abstract

Hypertension is the most prevalent chronic medical condition and a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In the majority of hypertensive cases, the underlying cause of hypertension cannot be easily identified because of the heterogeneous, polygenic and multi-factorial nature of hypertension. Metabolomics is a relatively new field of research that has been used to evaluate metabolic perturbations associated with disease, identify disease biomarkers and to both assess and predict drug safety and efficacy. Metabolomics has been increasingly used to characterize risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including hypertension, and it appears to have significant potential for uncovering mechanisms of this complex disease. This review details the analytical techniques, pre-analytical steps and study designs used in metabolomics studies, as well as the emerging role for metabolomics in gaining mechanistic insights into the development of hypertension. Suggestions as to the future direction for metabolomics research in the field of hypertension are also proposed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0000000000000168

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Griffin, 2006, The Cinderella story of metabolic profiling: does metabolomics get to go to the functional genomics ball Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol S, ci, 361, 147
  2. 1994, 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)., Lancet, 344, 1383
  3. Boos, 2006, Is hypertension an inflammatory process Curr Pharm D, es, 12, 1623
  4. 2000, Am J Obstet G, ynecol, 183, S1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nikolic, S. B., Sharman, J. E., Adams, M. J., & Edwards, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Lindsay M.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2014-06
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1159-1169
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087492315
Cited by
79
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
hypertension, metabolomics, cardiovascular risk factors, disease biomarkers, metabolic perturbation, hypertension pathogenesis, analytical methods
MeSH terms
Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Hypertension, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Risk Factors, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review