Cited by 2,081Electromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsOcular and Laser Science ResearchElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements

Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz)

Open access
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection·2020·Health Physics

Abstract

Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are used to enable a number of modern devices, including mobile telecommunications infrastructure and phones, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. As radiofrequency EMFs at sufficiently high power levels can adversely affect health, ICNIRP published Guidelines in 1998 for human exposure to time-varying EMFs up to 300 GHz, which included the radiofrequency EMF spectrum. Since that time, there has been a considerable body of science further addressing the relation between radiofrequency EMFs and adverse health outcomes, as well as significant developments in the technologies that use radiofrequency EMFs. Accordingly, ICNIRP has updated the radiofrequency EMF part of the 1998 Guidelines. This document presents these revised Guidelines, which provide protection for humans from exposure to EMFs from 100 kHz to 300 GHz.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hp.0000000000001210

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
Affiliations
Federal Office for Radiation Protection (DE)
Corresponding author
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
Venue
Health Physics
Published
2020-05
Volume
118
Issue
5
Pages
483-524
ISSN
  • 0017-9078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-5159
OpenAlex
W4205556338
Cited by
2,081
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 319 · 2025: 364 · 2024: 370 · 2023: 322 · 2022: 326 · 2021: 277 · 2020: 103
FWCI
122.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
  • Cancer Research UK
  • University of Wollongong
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Keywords
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, human exposure limits, ICNIRP guidelines, health effects of electromagnetic fields, mobile communication, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
MeSH terms
Electromagnetic Fields, Humans, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Protection, Radiation, Nonionizing, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review