Description of Transport Codes for Space Radiation Shielding
Abstract
Exposure to ionizing radiation in the space environment is one of the hazards faced by crews in space missions. As space radiations traverse spacecraft, habitat shielding, or tissues, their energies and compositions are altered by interactions with the shielding. Modifications to the radiation fields arise from atomic interactions of charged particles with orbital electrons and nuclear interactions leading to projectile and target fragmentation, including secondary particles such as neutrons, protons, mesons, and nuclear recoils. The transport of space radiation through shielding can be simulated using Monte Carlo techniques or deterministic solutions of the Boltzmann equation. To determine shielding requirements and to resolve radiation constraints for future human missions, the shielding evaluation of a spacecraft concept is required as an early step in the design process. To do this requires (1) accurate knowledge of space environmental models to define the boundary condition for transport calculations, (2) transport codes with detailed shielding and body geometry models to determine particle transmission into areas of internal shielding and at each critical body organ, and (3) the assessment of organ dosimetric quantities and biological risks by applying the corresponding response models for space radiation against the particle spectra that have been accurately determined from the transport code. This paper reviews current transport codes and analyzes their accuracy throu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Radiation transport codes have been validated by extensive comparisons to measurements, and they have been combined with detailed descriptions of the space environment to enable accurate simulations behind spacecraft shielding or on planetary surfaces.
“radiation transport codes have been validated by extensive comparisons to measurements, and they have been combined with detailed descriptions of the space environment to enable accurate simulations behind spacecraft shielding or on planetary surfaces [Cucinotta et al., 2011;Kim et al., 2012].”
From Comparison of Martian surface ionizing radiation measurements from MSL-RAD with Badhwar-O'Neill 2011/HZETRN model calculations (2014) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2012
Cites
Physical and biological organ dosimetry analysis for international space station astronauts
Cucinotta, F. A., Kim, M.-H. Y., Willingham, V., & George, K. A. (2008) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr1330.1 · Cited by 196 · cited 6× · see citing works
“5) (Cucinotta et al. 2000, 2008), and therefore these results support the conclusion that organ dose equivalents for ISS missions and many space shuttle missions are predominantly from GCR (980%).”
InfluentialSelf-citationReitz, G., Berger, T., Bilski, P., Facius, R., Hajek, M., Petrov, V., Puchalska, M., Zhou, D., Bossler, J., Akatov, Y., et al. (2009) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr1559.1 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationShielding from solar particle event exposures in deep space
Wilson, J. W., Cucinotta, F. A., Shinn, J. L., Simonsen, L. C., Dubey, R. R., Jordan, W. R., Jones, T. D., Chang, C. K., & Kim, M. Y. (1999) · Radiation Measurements · doi:10.1016/s1350-4487(99)00063-3 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ICRP Publication 123: Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Astronauts in Space
Dietze, G., Bartlett, D. T., Cool, D. A., Cucinotta, F. A., Jia, X., McAulay, I. R., Pelliccioni, M., Petrov, V., Reitz, G., & Sato, T. (2013) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2013.05.004 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, M. Y., Cucinotta, F. A., Nounu, H. N., Zeitlin, C., Hassler, D. M., Rafkin, S. C. R., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Ehresmann, B., Brinza, D. E., Böttcher, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/2013je004549 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kim, M.-H. Y., Wilson, J. W., & Cucinotta, F. A.
- Affiliations
- Universities Space Research Association (US)
- Langley Research Center (US)
- Johnson Space Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Myung-Hee Y.
- Venue
- Health Physics
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-639
- ISSN
- 0017-9078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992442065
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
- Keywords
- space radiation shielding, radiation transport codes, Monte Carlo simulation, Boltzmann equation, spacecraft radiation environment, organ dosimetry, biological risk assessment, probabilistic risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Extraterrestrial Environment, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Radiation Monitoring, Radiation Protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review