Cited by 37Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Feasibility and Potential Benefits of a Web-Based Intervention Delivered Acutely After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescents: A Pilot Study

Open access

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of evidence-based interventions for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of an interactive, Web-based intervention for mTBI. Setting: Emergency department and outpatient settings. Participants: Of the 21 adolescents aged 11 to 18 years with mTBI recruited from November 2013 to June 2014 within 96 hours of injury, 13 completed the program. Design: Prospective, open pilot. Intervention: The Web-based Self-Management Activity-restriction and Relaxation Training (SMART) program incorporates anticipatory guidance and psychoeducation, self-management and pacing of cognitive and physical activities, and cognitive-behavioral principles for early management of mTBI in adolescents. Main Measures: Primary: Daily Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Secondary: Daily self-reported ratings of activities and satisfaction survey. Results: Average time from injury to baseline testing was 14.0 (standard deviation = 16.7) hours. Baseline PCSS was 23.6 (range: 0-46), and daily activity was 1.8 (range: 0-5.75) hours. Repeated-measures, generalized linear mixed-effects model analysis demonstrated a significant decrease of PCSS at a rate of 2.0 points per day that stabilized after about 2 weeks. Daily activities, screen time, and physical activity increased by 0.06 (standard error [SE] = 0.04, P = .09), 0.04 (SE = 0.02, P = .15), and 0.03 (SE = 0.02, P = .05) hours per day, respectively, over the 4-week follow-up. Satisfaction was rated highly by parents and youth. Conclusions: Self-Management Activity-restriction and Relaxation Training is feasible and reported to be helpful and enjoyable by participants. Future research will need to determine the comparative benefits of SMART and ideal target population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/htr.0000000000000180

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 37

Metadata

Authors
Kurowski, B. G., Wade, S. L., Dexheimer, J. W., Dyas, J., Zhang, N., & Babcock, L.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2016-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
369-378
ISSN
0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2330778984
Cited by
37
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001425, UL1TR000077)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD074683, L40 HD066480)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, adolescents, online intervention, self-management, activity limitation, relaxation training, anticipatory guidance, psychoeducation, cognitive-behavioral intervention, post-concussion symptoms, physical activity, screen time, feasibility
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adolescent, Brain Concussion, Child, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Relaxation Therapy, Exercise, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Internet, Post-Concussion Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review