PHARMACOKINETIC RATIONALE FOR DOSING EVERY 2 WEEKS VERSUS 4 WEEKS WITH INTRAVITREAL RANIBIZUMAB, BEVACIZUMAB, AND AFLIBERCEPT (VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR TRAP-EYE)
Open accessAbstract
Purpose Monthly dosing with inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) results in stable or improved visual acuity in most patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. However, a minority of patients show little if any response to therapy with persistent or worsening macular fluid. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed to determine if more frequent dosing with anti-VEGF drugs could be theoretically beneficial. Methods A mathematical model comparing the time-dependent relative binding activities of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept (VEGF Trap-eye; VTE) was used to determine the theoretical peak and trough binding activities when the drugs were injected every 14 days and every 28 days. The intravitreal half-lives of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and the VTE were estimated to be 3.2, 5.6, and 4.8 days, respectively. The relative molar binding activities of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and the VTE used in the analyses were 1, 0.05 to 0.2, and 140, respectively. The expected peak and trough binding activities for ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and VTE were calculated. Dosing every 2 weeks was performed on selected patients who had a poor response to monthly therapy. Results Dosing of a drug every 2 weeks resulted in markedly improved trough binding activity, but had little impact on the peak binding activity when calculated through Day 28. The dosing of bevacizumab every 2 weeks resulted in trough binding levels that were superior to monthly dosing with ra…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some eyes require more frequent injections of anti-VEGF than monthly, such as every 2-3 weeks, to achieve primary response or following recurrences.
“Similarly some eyes require more frequent injections of anti-VEGF agent than monthly dosing, such as 2-3 weekly in order to achieve primary response or following recurrences.35”
From Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMD (2015) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
Ranibizumab versus Verteporfin for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Brown, D. M., Kaiser, P. K., Michels, M., Soubrane, G., Heier, J. S., Kim, R. Y., Sy, J. P., & Schneider, S. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa062655 · Cited by 3,522 · see citing works
A Treat and Extend Regimen Using Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Gupta, O. P., Shienbaum, G., Patel, A. H., Fecarotta, C., Kaiser, R. S., & Regillo, C. D. (2010) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.032 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Kaiser, P. K., Korobelnik, J.-F., Brown, D. M., Chong, V., Nguyen, Q. D., Ho, A. C., Ogura, Y., Simader, C., Jaffe, G. J., et al. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.011 · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMD
Amoaku, W. M., Chakravarthy, U., Gale, R., Gavin, M., Ghanchi, F., Gibson, J., Harding, S., Johnston, R. L., Kelly, S., Lotery, A., et al. (2015) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2015.48 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Submacular hemorrhage in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a synthesis of the literature
Stanescu-Segall, D., Balta, F., & Jackson, T. L. (2016) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.04.004 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Kiss, S., Grishanin, R., Nguyen, A., Rosario, R., Greengard, J. S., Nieves, J., Gelfman, C. M., & Gasmi, M. (2020) · Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2020.06.007 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Current best clinical practices—management of neovascular AMD
Brown, D., Heier, J. S., Boyer, D. S., Freund, K. B., Kaiser, P., Kim, J. E., & Sarraf, D. (2017) · Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases · doi:10.1177/2474126417725946 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stewart, M. W., Rosenfeld, P. J., Penha, F. M., Wang, F., Yehoshua, Z., Bueno-Lopez, E., & Lopez, P. F.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Baptist Hospital of Miami (US)
- Venue
- Retina
- Published
- 2011-12-18
- Volume
- Publish Ahead of Print
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 434-57
- ISSN
- 0275-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048433984
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Retina (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (P30EY014801)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Keywords
- ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, anti-VEGF therapy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, dosing frequency, pharmacokinetic modeling, elimination half-life, intravitreal injection, mathematical pharmacokinetic model
- MeSH terms
- Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Aged, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Vitreous Body, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Intravitreal Injections, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review