Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Complications. An Update of the Literature

Jaulim, Adil, Ahmed, Badia, Khanam, Tina, Chatziralli, Irini P.·2013·Retina

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinopathy and is considered to be an important cause of visual loss. In this review, the purpose is to make an update of the literature about the classification, epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical features, and complications of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Eligible articles were identified using a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, using the terms "branch retinal vein occlusion," "pathogenesis," "epidemiology," "risk factors," "clinical features," "diagnosis," and "complications." Additional articles were also selected from reference lists of articles identified by the electronic database search. RESULTS: Classification, epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical features, and complications are analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Branch retinal vein occlusion has an incidence of 0.5% to 1.2%. Several risk factors, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, thrombophilia and hypercoagulation, systemic and inflammatory diseases, medications, and ocular conditions, have found to be associated with BRVO. The symptoms depended on the site and severity of the occlusion. The average reduction in visual acuity for ischemic BRVO is 20/50 and for nonischemic BRVO is 20/60. Acute BRVO can be detected by fundoscopy, where flame hemorrhages, dot and blot hemorrhages, cotton wool spots, hard exudates, retinal edema, and dilated tortuous veins can be observed. Chronic BRVO would be more subtle and characterized by the appearance of venous collateral formation and vascular sheathing, in addition to complications previously mentioned. Areas of ischemia can be evaluated using fluorescein angiography. The extent of macular edema and the presence of retinal detachment can be detected by fundoscopic examination or fluorescein angiography, although optical coherence tomography is considered to be the best method. As far as complications, the most common is macular edema, followed by retinal neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage, or retinal detachment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/iae.0b013e3182870c15

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Jaulim, A., Ahmed, B., Khanam, T., & Chatziralli, I. P.
Venue
Retina
Published
2013-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
901-910
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315029662
Cited by
343
References
1
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Complications. An Update of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/iae.0b013e3182870c15
The paper
Jaulim, A., Ahmed, B., Khanam, T., & Chatziralli, I. P. (2013). BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Complications. An Update of the Literature. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e3182870c15

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.