Cited by 71Ocular Surface and Contact LensFatty Acid Research and HealthRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Oral Omega-3 Fatty Acid Treatment for Dry Eye in Contact Lens Wearers

Bhargava, Rahul, Kumar, Prachi·2015·Cornea

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acid (O3FA) supplementation on dry eye symptoms, tear film tests, and conjunctival impression cytology in patients with contact lens wear-associated dry eye. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multicentric trial, contact lens wearers (n = 496) were randomized to receive either O3FAs or placebo capsules (corn oil) twice daily for 6 months. Subjects underwent examinations at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. At each visit, a questionnaire of dry eye symptoms and lens wear comfort was administered. Subjects further underwent measurement of tear film break-up time (TBUT) and a Schirmer test. Conjunctival impression cytology was performed by the transfer method. Improvement in symptoms and lens wear comfort were primary outcome measures. Changes from baseline in TBUT, Schirmer, and Nelson grade at 6 months were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: The mean improvement in symptom score in the O3FA group was 4.7 ± 2 (2.0) as compared with 0.5 ± 2 (0.9) in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). Lens wear comfort levels improved significantly (P < 0.0001) from baseline. There was a significant increase in TBUT [3.3 ± 2 (1.5)] and Nelson grade [0.7 ± 2 (0.6)] in the O3FA group (P < 0.0001) as compared with 0.3 ± 2 (0.6) and 0.1 ± 2 (0.4) in the placebo group (P = 0.164 and 0.094, respectively). However, the magnitude of increase in Schirmer score [2.0 ± 2 (1.5)] was relatively small (P = 0.08). CONCLUSI…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ico.0000000000000386

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most previous randomized, placebo-controlled trials of n-3 fatty acids for dry eye disease showed significantly greater improvement in symptoms or in at least one sign in the n-3 group than in the placebo group.

    “Most of these trials showed significantly greater improvement in symptoms or in at least one of several signs of dry eye disease in the n–3 fatty acid group than in the placebo group.15,18–22,24,26”
  • Aside from several large trials conducted in India by Bhargava et al., previous clinical trials involved fewer than 125 total patients.

    “Aside from several large trials that were conducted in India by Bhargava et al.,15–18 the previous clinical trials involved fewer than 125 total patients.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhargava, R., & Kumar, P.
Affiliations
Santosh University (IN)
Venue
Cornea
Published
2015-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
413-420
ISSN
0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322046739
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cornea (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, dietary supplementation, dry eye, contact lens wear, tear film break-up time, Schirmer test, conjunctival impression cytology, dry eye symptoms
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Capsules, Cell Count, Contact Lenses, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tears, Dry Eye Syndromes, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Epithelium, Corneal, Goblet Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review