Effect of Oral Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Contrast Sensitivity in Patients With Moderate Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Prospective Placebo-Controlled Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of oral supplementation with omega-3 (ω-3) fatty acids (FAs) in improving contrast sensitivity (CS) of patients with moderate meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: In this prospective study, 60 patients with moderate MGD were allocated alternately to treatment and control groups. Both groups received warm compresses, lid massage, and artificial tear substitutes. The treatment group also received oral supplements of 1.2 g ω-3 FAs per day. All parameters were recorded at baseline and at 12 weeks and included Ocular Surface Disease Index scores, CS testing at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd), tear break-up time, Schirmer test I without anesthesia, corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and meibum quality and expressibility. RESULTS: At the end of 12 weeks, significant improvement in CS was seen in the treatment group in 7 of the 8 testing conditions (3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd photopic and 6, 12, and 18 cpd mesopic), whereas in the placebo group, significant improvement was seen only in 3 of the 8 testing conditions (3 cpd photopic, 6 and 18 cpd mesopic). Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear break-up time, ocular surface staining, and meibum quality and expressibility improved significantly in both groups, but more so in the treatment group. Schirmer scores showed no significant improvement in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Oral supplementation with ω-3 FAs significantly improved CS under both photopic and mesopic testing conditions in patien…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most previous randomized, placebo-controlled trials of n-3 fatty acids for dry eye disease showed significantly greater improvement in symptoms or in at least one sign in the n-3 group than in the placebo group.
“Most of these trials showed significantly greater improvement in symptoms or in at least one of several signs of dry eye disease in the n–3 fatty acid group than in the placebo group.15,18–22,24,26”
From n−3 Fatty Acid Supplementation for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
n−3 Fatty Acid Supplementation for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
The Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study Research Group (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1709691 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
- Authors
- Malhotra, C., Singh, S., Chakma, P., & Jain, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
- Venue
- Cornea
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 637-643
- ISSN
- 0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2317502247
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cornea (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Keywords
- omega-3 fatty acids, meibomian gland dysfunction, contrast sensitivity, oral supplementation, dry eye, tear film stability, meibum quality, ocular surface disease, mesopic vision
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Eyelid Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Meibomian Glands, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Color Vision, Mesopic Vision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review