Cited by 47Antibiotic Use and ResistanceInfection Control in HealthcareSurgical site infection prevention

Comparison of antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control activities and resources between low-/middle- and high-income countries

Open access
Villanueva, Paola, Coffin, Susan E., Mekasha, Amha, McMullan, Brendan, Cotton, Mark F., Bryant, Penelope A.·2022·Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growth of antimicrobial resistance worldwide has led to increased focus on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, although primarily in high-income countries (HIC). We aimed to compare pediatric AMS and IPC resources/activities between low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and HIC and to determine the barriers and priorities for AMS and IPC in LMIC as assessed by clinicians in those settings. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to clinicians working in HIC and LMIC healthcare facilities in 2020. RESULTS: Participants were from 135 healthcare settings in 39 LMIC and 27 HIC. Formal AMS and IPC programs were less frequent in LMIC than HIC settings (AMS 42% versus 76% and IPC 58% versus 89%). Only 47% of LMIC facilities conducted audits of antibiotic use for pediatric patients, with less reliable availability of World Health Organization Access list antibiotics (29% of LMIC facilities). Hand hygiene promotion was the most common IPC intervention in both LMIC and HIC settings (82% versus 91%), although LMIC hospitals had more limited access to reliable water supply for handwashing and antiseptic hand rub. The greatest perceived barrier to pediatric AMS and IPC in both LMIC and HIC was lack of education: only 17% of LMIC settings had regular/required education on antimicrobial prescribing and only 25% on IPC. CONCLUSIONS: Marked differences exist in availability of AMS and IPC resources in LMIC as compared with HIC. A collaborative international approach is urgently needed to combat antimicrobial resistance, using targeted strategies that address the imbalance in global AMS and IPC resource availability and activities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/inf.0000000000003318

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent survey with participants from over 66 countries indicated that LMICs have a lower number of IPC and AMS programmes compared with high-income countries.

    “A recent study, reporting on survey findings conducted with participants from over 66 countries indicated that LMICs have a lower number of infection prevention and control (IPC) and AMS programmes compared with high-income countries.21”

    From Rationalizing irrational prescribing—infection-related attitudes and practices across paediatric surgery specialties in a hospital in South India (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results report that formal AMS and IPC programmes were less frequent in LMIC than HIC healthcare settings. The survey covered exactly 66 countries, not over 66, and the comparison concerns the participating healthcare settings rather than all facilities in those countries. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. 2015. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/193736/9789241509763_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed December 14, 2020. 26242647
  2. [2]Davey P Marwick CA Scott CL. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 2: CD003543. 28178770 PMC6464541

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villanueva, P., Coffin, S. E., Mekasha, A., McMullan, B., Cotton, M. F., & Bryant, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Tikur Anbessa Hospital (ET)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Villanueva, Paola
  • Mekasha, Amha
  • Bryant, Penelope A.
Venue
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2022-02-08
Volume
41
Issue
3S
Pages
S3-S9
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210887061
Cited by
47
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
Keywords
antimicrobial stewardship, infection control, antimicrobial resistance, low- and middle-income countries, high-income countries, pediatric patients, hand hygiene, clinician education, implementation barriers, global health disparities
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Developing Countries, Health Facilities, Health Resources, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pediatrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Infection Control, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review