The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Vancomycin Dosing in Children Using Area Under the Curve Exposure
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: : Our objectives were to (1) determine the pharmacokinetic indices of vancomycin in pediatric patients; and (2) compare attainment of 2 target exposures: area under curve (AUC) / minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥400 and trough concentration ≥15 mcg/mL. METHODS: : The population-based pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM 7.2 for children ≥3 months old who received vancomycin for ≥48 hours from 2003 to 2011. A 1-compartment model with first-order kinetics was used to estimate clearance, volume of distribution and AUC. Empiric Bayesian post hoc individual parameters and Monte Carlo simulations (N = 11,000) were performed. RESULTS: : Analysis included 702 patients with 1660 vancomycin serum concentrations. Median age was 6.6 (interquartile range 2.2-13.4) years, weight 22.7 (12.6-46) kg and baseline serum creatinine 0.40 (0.30-0.60) mg/dL. Final model pharmacokinetic indices were clearance (L/h) = 0.248 * Wt * (0.48/serum creatinine) * (ln(age)/7.8) and volume of distribution (L) = 0.636 * Wt. Using these parameters and the observed MIC distribution, Monte Carlo simulation indicated that the initial median dose of 44 (39-52) mg/kg/day was inadequate in most subjects. Regimens of 60 mg/kg/day for subjects ≥12 years old and 70 mg/kg/day for those <12 years old achieved target AUC/MIC in ~75% and trough concentrations ≥15 in ~45% of virtual subjects. An AUC/MIC ~400 corresponded to trough concentration ~8 to 9 mcg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: : Targeted exposure using vancomycin AUC/MIC, compared with trough concentrations, is a more realistic target in children. Depending on age, serum creatinine and MIC distribution, vancomycin in a dosage of 60 to 70 mg/kg/day was necessary to achieve AUC/MIC ≥ 400 in 75% of patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rybak, M., Lomaestro, B., Rotschafer, J. C., Moellering, R., Craig, W., Billeter, M., Dalovisio, J. R., & Levine, D. P. (2009) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp080434 · Cited by 1,795
Kullar, R., Davis, S. L., Levine, D. P., & Rybak, M. J. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir124 · Cited by 463 · cited 1×
“To optimize good clinical outcomes for invasive MRSA infections using pharmacokinetics (PK)–pharmacodynamics of vancomycin, studies in adults support targeting area under the curve (AUC) of the serum concentrations versus time over 24 hours to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of ≥400, which frequently corr…”
Method
Cited by
From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Model‐Informed Precision Dosing for Antibiotics
Wicha, S. G., Märtson, A., Nielsen, E. I., Koch, B. C. P., Friberg, L. E., Alffenaar, J., Minichmayr, I. K., & the International Society of Anti‐Infective Pharmacology (ISAP), T. P. S. G. O. T. E. S. O. C. M. (2021) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.2202 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Le, J., Bradley, J. S., Murray, W., Romanowski, G. L., Tran, T. T., Nguyen, N., Cho, S., Natale, S., Bui, I., Tran, T. M., & Capparelli, E. V.
- Venue
- Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e155-e163
- ISSN
- 0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987149305
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Vancomycin Dosing in Children Using Area Under the Curve Exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/inf.0b013e318286378e
- The paper
- Le, J., Bradley, J. S., Murray, W., Romanowski, G. L., Tran, T. T., Nguyen, N., Cho, S., Natale, S., Bui, I., Tran, T. M., & Capparelli, E. V. (2013). Improved Vancomycin Dosing in Children Using Area Under the Curve Exposure. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0b013e318286378e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.