Cited by 41Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Brain mechanisms supporting violated expectations of pain

Open access

Abstract

The subjective experience of pain is influenced by interactions between experiences, future predictions, and incoming afferent information. Expectations of high pain can exacerbate pain, whereas expectations of low pain during a consistently noxious stimulus can produce significant reductions in pain. However, the brain mechanisms associated with processing mismatches between expected and experienced pain are poorly understood, but are important for imparting salience to a sensory event to override erroneous top-down expectancy-mediated information. This investigation examined pain-related brain activation when expectations of pain were abruptly violated. After conditioning participants to cues predicting low or high pain, 10 incorrectly cued stimuli were administered across 56 stimulus trials to determine whether expectations would be less influential on pain when there is a high discordance between prestimulus cues and corresponding thermal stimulation. Incorrectly cued stimuli produced pain ratings and pain-related brain activation consistent with placebo analgesia, nocebo hyperalgesia, and violated expectations. Violated expectations of pain were associated with activation in distinct regions of the inferior parietal lobe, including the supramarginal and angular gyrus, and intraparietal sulcus, the superior parietal lobe, cerebellum, and occipital lobe. Thus, violated expectations of pain engage mechanisms supporting salience-driven sensory discrimination, working memory, and associative learning processes. By overriding the influence of expectations on pain, these brain mechanisms are likely engaged in clinical situations in which patients' unrealistic expectations of pain relief diminish the efficacy of pain treatments. Accordingly, these findings underscore the importance of maintaining realistic expectations to augment the effectiveness of pain management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000231

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 41

Metadata

Authors
Zeidan, F., Lobanov, O. V., Kraft, R. A., & Coghill, R. C.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Coghill, Robert C.
Venue
Pain
Published
2015-09
Volume
156
Issue
9
Pages
1772-1785
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2416487493
Cited by
41
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Wake Forest School of Medicine
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS 39426, R01NS039426)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (L30 AT006838, F32AT006949, K99AT008238)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain anticipation, expectancy violation, placebo analgesia, nocebo hyperalgesia, inferior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, intraparietal sulcus, superior parietal lobule, cerebellum, occipital lobe, thermal pain, working memory, associative learning, pain management
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Cues, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Pain, Pain Measurement, Physical Stimulation, Psychophysics, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers, Nocebo Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review