Photographs of Daily Activities-Youth English: validating a targeted assessment of worry and anticipated pain
Abstract
PHODA is an electronic measure that individualizes and guides treatment for individuals with chronic pain. Implicit in its design is recognition that pain-related fear is a driving force that impedes treatment progress. With this tool, patients visually rate their expectations about the harmful consequences of specific movements. This study aimed to (1) develop and validate PHODA-Youth English (PHODA-YE) and (2) evaluate the potential impact of PHODA-YE assessment on treatment outcomes. Participants were 195 youth, age 8 to 20 years, who presented to an outpatient pain clinic for evaluation (n = 99), or enrolled at the Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center (PPRC) intensive program (PPRC; n = 96). All patients completed the PHODA-YE along with measures of emotional functioning and disability. Patients in the PPRC completed the measure at both admission and discharge. After eliminating infrequently endorsed and poorly loading items, factor analytic procedures yielded a 4-subscale, 50-item measure with strong internal consistency (from 0.92 to 0.97 across subscales). Fear, avoidance, and functional disability were strongly associated with PHODA-YE scores, supporting construct validity. Within the PPRC sample, PHODA-YE was sensitive to changes over time in relation to functional improvements. Across the PPRC sample, patients found it helpful to complete the PHODA and target feared activities. Altogether, the PHODA-YE is a valid and concrete assessment tool that rapidly identifies specific activities and movements that elicit fearful responses from patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Simons, L. E., Pielech, M., McAvoy, S., Conroy, C., Hogan, M., Verbunt, J. A., & Goossens, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Department of Rehabilitation-Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Simons, Laura E.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2017-01-24
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 912-921
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- 1872-6623
- OpenAlex
- W2583179565
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- chronic pain, fear of pain, pain anticipation, worry, fear-avoidance beliefs, functional disability, pediatric pain, pain rehabilitation, scale validation, treatment targeting, daily activities
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Photography, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review