CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Pain Management and Placebo EffectPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Underpredicting pain: an experimental investigation into the benefits and risks

Peerdeman, Kaya J., Geers, Andrew L., Della Porta, Delia, Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S., Kirsch, Irving·2021·Pain
DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002199
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Expectancies can shape pain and other experiences. Generally, experiences change in the direction of what is expected (ie, assimilation effects), as seen with placebo effects. However, in case of large expectation-experience discrepancies, experiences might change away from what is expected (ie, contrast effects). Previous research has demonstrated contrast effects on various outcomes, but not pain. We investigated the effects of strong underpredictions of pain on experienced pain intensity. In addition, we assessed related outcomes including (certainty of) expectations, fear of pain, pain unpleasantness, autonomic responses, and trust. Healthy participants (study 1: n = 81 and study 2: n = 123) received verbal suggestions that subsequent heat stimuli would be moderately or highly painful (correct prediction), mildly painful (medium underprediction; study 2 only), or nonpainful (strong underprediction). Both studies showed that participants experienced less intense pain upon strong underprediction than upon correct prediction (ie, assimilation). Expected pain, fear of pain, and pain unpleasantness were generally also lowered. However, strong underprediction simultaneously lowered certainty of expectations and trust in the experimenter. Study 2 indicated that the effects of strong underprediction vs medium underprediction generally did not differ. Moreover, study 2 provided some indications for reduced heart rate and skin conductance levels but increased skin conductance responses upon strong underprediction. In conclusion, even strong underpredictions of pain can reduce pain (ie, cause assimilation), although not significantly more than medium underpredictions. However, strong underpredictions can cause uncertainty and undermine trust. These findings suggest that healthcare providers may wish to be cautious with providing overly positive information about painful medical procedures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002199

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Peerdeman, K. J., Geers, A. L., Della Porta, D., Veldhuijzen, D. S., & Kirsch, I.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • Unit Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Peerdeman, Kaya J.
ORCID
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2021-01-15
Volume
162
Issue
7
Pages
2024-2035
ISSN
  • 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-6623
DOI
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002199
OpenAlex
W3122034998
Cited by
25
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (453-16-004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
pain anticipation, contrast effects, assimilation effect, placebo effect, verbal suggestion, pain intensity, fear of pain, pain unpleasantness, skin conductance, heart rate
MeSH terms
Fear, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Risk Assessment, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Underpredicting pain: an experimental investigation into the benefits and risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002199
The paper
Peerdeman, K. J., Geers, A. L., Della Porta, D., Veldhuijzen, D. S., & Kirsch, I. (2021). Underpredicting pain: an experimental investigation into the benefits and risks. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002199