Cited by 18Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMental Health and Psychiatry

Model-Guided Antipsychotic Dose Reduction in Schizophrenia: A Pilot, Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Ozawa, Chisa, Bies, Robert R., Pillai, Nikhil, Suzuki, Takefumi, Mimura, Masaru, Uchida, Hiroyuki·2019·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Purpose/Background: Patients with schizophrenia as well as their psychiatrists are hesitant to reduce the antipsychotic dose in fear of relapse. To overcome such dilemmas, we developed models to individually calculate an oral dose that corresponds to a given target dopamine D 2 receptor occupancy. Methods/Procedures: In this pilot, 52-week single-blind randomized controlled trial, 35 clinically stable patients with schizophrenia receiving either risperidone or olanzapine monotherapy were randomly assigned to dose reduction (n = 17) or dose maintenance group (n = 18). In the former group, baseline doses were reduced to the doses corresponding to 65% D 2 occupancy (the lower end of therapeutic window) at trough that were calculated from randomly collected plasma concentrations using our models. Findings/Results: In the dose reduction group, doses of risperidone and olanzapine were decreased from 4.2 ± 1.9 to 1.4 ± 0.4 and 12.8 ± 3.9 to 6.7 ± 1.8 mg/d, whereas the doses in the dose maintenance group were 4.3 ± 1.9 and 15.8 ± 4.6 mg/d, respectively. Twelve subjects (70.5%) and 13 subjects (72.2%) in the dose reduction and dose maintenance groups completed the study (P= 0.604), whereas 3 subjects (18.8%) and none dropped out because of clinical worsening in the dose reduction and dose maintenance groups, respectively. There were not significant differences in score changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale between the 2 groups but in Positive subscale scores in the Clinical Global Impression–Schizophrenia (0.4 ± 0.7 in the dose reduction group vs −0.1 ± 0.7 in the dose maintenance group,P= 0.029). Implications/Conclusions: Although our model-guided dose reduction strategy was found to be comparable with no-dose change in terms of dropout rates, safety issues have to be further examined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001046

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozawa, C., Bies, R. R., Pillai, N., Suzuki, T., Mimura, M., & Uchida, H.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Ozawa, Chisa
  • Suzuki, Takefumi
  • Mimura, Masaru
  • Uchida, Hiroyuki
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2019-06-11
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
329-335
ISSN
  • 0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-712X
OpenAlex
W2951219121
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, antipsychotic dose reduction, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy, risperidone, olanzapine, plasma drug concentration, relapse risk, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review