Cited by 88Schizophrenia research and treatmentPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical studies and practices

Olanzapine Plasma Concentrations After Treatment With 10, 20, and 40 mg/d in Patients With Schizophrenia: An Analysis of Correlations With Efficacy, Weight Gain, and Prolactin Concentration

Citrome, Leslie, Stauffer, Virginia L., Chen, Lei, Kinon, Bruce J., Kurtz, Darcie L., Jacobson, Jennie G., Bergstrom, Richard F.·2009·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Objectives of the study were to evaluate the relationship between olanzapine plasma concentrations and efficacy, prolactin, and weight and to assess effects of smoking, sex, and race on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral olanzapine up to 40 mg/d. Patients were randomly allocated to olanzapine 10, 20, or 40 mg/d for 8 weeks. Olanzapine concentrations in 634 samples from 380 patients were analyzed. Mean sample collection time was approximately 15 hours after dose for all groups. Mean olanzapine concentrations were 19.7 +/- 11.4, 37.9 +/- 22.8, and 74.5 +/- 43.7 ng/mL for 10-, 20-, and 40-mg doses, respectively. Olanzapine concentration and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale improvement were not significantly correlated. Change in both weight and prolactin showed significant dose response. Prolactin concentration was correlated with olanzapine concentration (r = 0.46, P < 0.001). No significant correlation between olanzapine concentration and weight change was observed. Olanzapine concentrations were lower in self-reported smokers (16.5 +/- 9.6, 34.2 +/- 20.8, and 60.9 +/- 34.6 ng/mL) than in self-reported nonsmokers (25.6 +/- 12.3, 43.4 +/- 24.7, and 113.2 +/- 44.0 ng/mL) for 10-, 20-, and 40-mg doses, respectively (P </= 0.022). In the 40-mg group only, African Americans had a lower mean olanzapine concentration than whites (65.6 +/- 44.1 and 84.8 +/- 44.1 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.048). Women had numerically but not significantly higher mean olanzapine concentrati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181a289cb

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Citrome, L., Stauffer, V. L., Chen, L., Kinon, B. J., Kurtz, D. L., Jacobson, J. G., & Bergstrom, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Citrome, Leslie
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2009-06
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
278-283
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988430501
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
olanzapine, pharmacokinetics, schizophrenia, plasma drug concentration, dose-response relationship, prolactin, weight gain, smoking, sex differences, racial differences, African Americans, antipsychotic efficacy
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Administration, Oral, Adult, Benzodiazepines, Black or African American, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prolactin, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Sex Factors, Smoking, Antipsychotic Agents, Weight Gain, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review