A Randomized, 3-Phase, 34-Week, Double-Blind, Long-Term Efficacy Study of Osmotic-Release Oral System-Methylphenidate in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Abstract
We conducted a 3-phase, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study design of osmotic-release oral system (OROS)-methylphenidate (MPH) in adults (19-60 years of age) with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder as classified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Phase 1 of the study was a 6-week, acute efficacy trial (n = 223), phase 2 was a 24-week, double-blind continuation study of responders (n = 96), and phase 3 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week discontinuation study (n = 23). The mean daily dosage at phase 1 endpoint was 78.4 ± 31.7 mg (0.97 ± 0.32 mg/kg) OROS-MPH and 96.6 ± 26.5 mg (1.16 ± 0.19 mg/kg) placebo (P < 0.0001). Clinical response at phase 1 endpoint was significantly greater in the OROS-MPH group (62%, n = 67 vs 37%, n = 41; P < 0.001) and was maintained throughout 24 weeks of double-blind treatment. With double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation, however, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of relapse between OROS-MPH responders randomized to placebo and those randomized to continue active treatment (18%, n = 2 vs 0%, n = 0; P = 0.1). As expected, decreased appetite, insomnia, being tense/jittery, mucosal dryness, and neurological symptoms were statistically significantly associated with OROS-MPH treatment. More work is needed to be conducted with larger samples being followed to study completion to better understand the long-lasting impact of pharmacotherapy for adu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several stimulants are effective in the treatment of adult ADHD.
“Similar to present review, several stimulants are effective in the treatment of adult ADHD.”
From Exploratory meta-analysis on lisdexamfetamine versus placebo in adult ADHD (2014) · cites this paper as [32]
The response rate of MPH ER versus placebo (50% vs 18%) and OROS MPH versus placebo (67% vs 37%) in adult ADHD is comparable with the response rate in this review (lisdexamfetamine 70% vs placebo 37%).
“Previous studies have shown that the response rate of MPH ER treatment vs placebo (50% vs 18%)31 and of OROS MPH treatment vs placebo (67% vs 37%)32 in adult ADHD is comparable with the response rate in this review (LDX [70%] vs placebo [37%]).”
From Exploratory meta-analysis on lisdexamfetamine versus placebo in adult ADHD (2014) · cites this paper as [32]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 19 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Biederman, J., Mick, E., Surman, C., Doyle, R., Hammerness, P., Kotarski, M., & Spencer, T.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 549-553
- ISSN
- 0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032298896
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- osmotic-release oral system, methylphenidate, adult ADHD, long-term efficacy, relapse after treatment discontinuation, adverse effects, appetite loss, insomnia, jitteriness
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adult, Age Factors, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Middle Aged, Osmosis, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review