Cited by 76Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

A Randomized, 3-Phase, 34-Week, Double-Blind, Long-Term Efficacy Study of Osmotic-Release Oral System-Methylphenidate in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Biederman, Joseph, Mick, Eric, Surman, Craig, Doyle, Robert, Hammerness, Paul, Kotarski, Meghan, Spencer, Thomas·2010·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

We conducted a 3-phase, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study design of osmotic-release oral system (OROS)-methylphenidate (MPH) in adults (19-60 years of age) with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder as classified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Phase 1 of the study was a 6-week, acute efficacy trial (n = 223), phase 2 was a 24-week, double-blind continuation study of responders (n = 96), and phase 3 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week discontinuation study (n = 23). The mean daily dosage at phase 1 endpoint was 78.4 ± 31.7 mg (0.97 ± 0.32 mg/kg) OROS-MPH and 96.6 ± 26.5 mg (1.16 ± 0.19 mg/kg) placebo (P < 0.0001). Clinical response at phase 1 endpoint was significantly greater in the OROS-MPH group (62%, n = 67 vs 37%, n = 41; P < 0.001) and was maintained throughout 24 weeks of double-blind treatment. With double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation, however, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of relapse between OROS-MPH responders randomized to placebo and those randomized to continue active treatment (18%, n = 2 vs 0%, n = 0; P = 0.1). As expected, decreased appetite, insomnia, being tense/jittery, mucosal dryness, and neurological symptoms were statistically significantly associated with OROS-MPH treatment. More work is needed to be conducted with larger samples being followed to study completion to better understand the long-lasting impact of pharmacotherapy for adu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181ee84a7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several stimulants are effective in the treatment of adult ADHD.

    “Similar to present review, several stimulants are effective in the treatment of adult ADHD.”
  • The response rate of MPH ER versus placebo (50% vs 18%) and OROS MPH versus placebo (67% vs 37%) in adult ADHD is comparable with the response rate in this review (lisdexamfetamine 70% vs placebo 37%).

    “Previous studies have shown that the response rate of MPH ER treatment vs placebo (50% vs 18%)31 and of OROS MPH treatment vs placebo (67% vs 37%)32 in adult ADHD is comparable with the response rate in this review (LDX [70%] vs placebo [37%]).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 76

Authors
Biederman, J., Mick, E., Surman, C., Doyle, R., Hammerness, P., Kotarski, M., & Spencer, T.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2010-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
549-553
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032298896
Cited by
76
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
osmotic-release oral system, methylphenidate, adult ADHD, long-term efficacy, relapse after treatment discontinuation, adverse effects, appetite loss, insomnia, jitteriness
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Age Factors, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Middle Aged, Osmosis, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review