Cited by 22Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Use of Mental Health Telemetry to Enhance Identification and Predictive Value of Early Changes During Augmentation Treatment of Major Depression

Schaffer, Ayal, Kreindler, David, Reis, Catherine, Levitt, Anthony J.·2013·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Standard clinical trial methodology in depression does not allow for careful examination of early changes in symptom intensity. The purpose of this study was to use daily "Mental Health Telemetry" (MHT) to prospectively record change in depressive and anxiety symptoms for depressed patients receiving augmentation treatment, and determine the extent and predictive capacity of early changes. We report results of a 6-week, open-label study of the addition of quetiapine XR (range, 50-300 mg) for adult patients (n = 26) with major depressive disorder who were nonresponsive to antidepressant treatment. In addition to regular study visits, all participants completed daily, wirelessly transmitted self-report ratings of symptoms on a Smartphone. Daily and 3-day moving average mean scores were calculated, and associations between early symptom change and eventual response to treatment were determined. Improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms was identified as early as day 1 of treatment. Of the total decline in depression severity over 6 weeks, 9% was present at day 1, 28% at day 2, 39% at days 3 and 4, 65% at day 7, and 80% at day 10. Self-report rating of early improvement (≥20%) in depressive symptoms at day 7 significantly predicted responder status at week 6 (P = 0.03). Clinician-rated depressive and anxiety symptoms only became significantly associated with responder status at day 14. In conclusion, very early changes in depressive symptoms were identified using MHT, early changes accounted for most of total change, and MHT-recorded improvement as early as day 7 significantly predicted response to treatment at study end point.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0b013e31829e8359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 22

Authors
Schaffer, A., Kreindler, D., Reis, C., & Levitt, A. J.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Schaffer, Ayal
  • Kreindler, David
  • Reis, Catherine
  • Levitt, Anthony J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2013-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
775-781
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076587638
Cited by
22
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
major depressive disorder, antidepressant augmentation, quetiapine, early treatment response prediction, daily symptom monitoring, anxiety symptoms, treatment-resistant depression
MeSH terms
Quetiapine Fumarate, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Dibenzothiazepines, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Telemetry, Time Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review