Cited by 14Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryResilience and Mental Health

The Effects of Meditation, Race, and Anxiety on Stroke Survivor Resilience

Love, Mary F., Sharrief, Anjail, LoBiondo-Wood, Geri, Cron, Stanley G., Sanner Beauchamp, Jennifer E.·2020·Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significant gaps exist in the identification and management of psychological effects of stroke on survivors. Interventions to enhance resilience, the ability to rebound from stress or adversity, could positively impact stroke recovery. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of meditation on resilience of community-dwelling stroke survivors and to identify resilience predictor variables in these survivors. METHODS: This was a substudy with secondary analysis of existing data from the parent study, MEditatioN for post stroke Depression. The effect of meditation on stroke survivor resilience in the intervention group (n = 20) was evaluated with a paired samples t test, with measures at baseline and immediately after the 4-week intervention. Baseline resilience predictor variables for all stroke survivors (n = 35) were evaluated with univariable analysis and multiple linear regression modeling. RESULTS: The increase in stroke survivor resilience scores from baseline (mean [SD], 3.46 [0.81]) to intervention completion (mean [SD], 3.58 [1.02]) was not statistically significant (t = 0.60, df = 19, P = .56). One-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc analysis revealed that baseline resilience was significantly lower (P = .02) for non-Hispanic black participants than for non-Hispanic white participants. Multiple linear regression with resilience as the dependent variable, race as a fixed factor, and trait anxiety as a covariate was significant (F 3,33 = 6.32, P = .002) and accounted for nearly 33% of the variance in baseline resilience. CONCLUSION: The effects of meditation on stroke survivor resilience should be tested in larger clinical trials that would explore the influence of social determinants of health, perceived stress, race-related stress, and anxiety subtypes on resilience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000509

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Love, M. F., Sharrief, A., LoBiondo-Wood, G., Cron, S. G., & Sanner Beauchamp, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Published
2020-03-10
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
96-102
ISSN
  • 0888-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-2810
OpenAlex
W3011269248
Cited by
14
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
meditation, stroke survivors, resilience, race, trait anxiety, racial disparities, community-dwelling stroke survivors, social determinants of health, racial stress, post-stroke depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Survivors, Meditation, Stroke, Racial Groups, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review