Cited by 18Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementMedication Adherence and ComplianceNursing care and research

Factors Associated With Adherence to Fluid Restriction in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis in Indonesia

Open access
PERDANA, Melyza, YEN, Miaofen·2021·Journal of Nursing Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The factors related to fluid intake adherence among patients undergoing hemodialysis have been explored in many studies. However, most of these were conducted in Western countries and have produced inconsistent results. A study of this issue in Indonesia, a tropical country with strong herbal medicine traditions, may show different results. In addition to demographic characteristics, self-efficacy is a standard measurement used in chronic care management activities such as hemodialysis treatment. Understanding the reasons behind patient nonadherence in Indonesia may help nurses better manage the fluid intake of patients. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the factors that predict patient adherence to fluid intake restrictions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 153 patients undergoing hemodialysis at two hospitals. Intradialytic weight gain over a 1-month period was recorded to assess the participants' adherence to fluid intake restrictions. Intradialytic weight gains of more than 2 kg was considered to be nonadherent. A daily urine output and level of thirst were also recorded. The participants completed an adapted self-efficacy questionnaire, Swedish Fluid Intake Appraisal Inventory, and the data were analyzed together with demographic characteristic and clinical parameters using hierarchical multiple regression. RESULTS: The results revealed that most of the respondents did not adequately adhere to fluid intake restrictions (59.5%). Intradialytic weight gain was shown to strongly correlate with self-efficacy (p < .05, β = -.201), gender (p < .05, β = -.179), educational background (p = .05, β = .159), and urine output (p < .05, β = -.168). Demographic characteristic explained 10.6% and self-efficacy explained 3.9% of the variance in fluid adherence. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Female participants with higher self-efficacy scores reported the lowest average level of intradialytic weight gain, indicating better adherence to fluid intake restrictions. Several demographic factors as well as self-efficacy were identified as potential predictors of fluid intake restriction adherence. Therefore, measuring self-efficacy periodically is a good initial step toward detecting those patients who are at higher risk of noncompliance with fluid intake restrictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PERDANA, M., & YEN, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
YEN, Miaofen
Venue
Journal of Nursing Research
Published
2021-12
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
e182
ISSN
  • 1682-3141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-965X
OpenAlex
W3201852949
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
fluid restriction, hemodialysis, medication adherence, self-efficacy, intradialytic weight gain, urine output, thirst, demographic factors, herbal medicine, chronic kidney disease, nursing care
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Indonesia, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review