The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health and Productivity as a Business Strategy: A Multiemployer Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore methodological refinements in measuring health-related lost productivity and to assess the business implications of a full-cost approach to managing health. METHODS: Health-related lost productivity was measured among 10 employers with a total of 51,648 employee respondents using the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire combined with 1,134,281 medical and pharmacy claims. Regression analyses were used to estimate the associations of health conditions with absenteeism and presenteeism using a range of models. RESULTS: Health-related productivity costs are significantly greater than medical and pharmacy costs alone (on average 2.3 to 1). Chronic conditions such as depression/anxiety, obesity, arthritis, and back/neck pain are especially important causes of productivity loss. Comorbidities have significant non-additive effects on both absenteeism and presenteeism. Executives/Managers experience as much or more monetized productivity loss from depression and back pain as Laborers/Operators. Testimonials are reported from participating companies on how the study helped shape their corporate health strategies. CONCLUSIONS: A strong link exists between health and productivity. Integrating productivity data with health data can help employers develop effective workplace health human capital investment strategies. More research is needed to understand the impacts of comorbidity and to evaluate the cost effectiveness of health and productivity interventions from an employer perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa022615 · Cited by 5,079
Cited by
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017
American Diabetes Association (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci18-0007 · Cited by 2,528
Bray, G. A., Kim, K. K., Wilding, J. P. H., & on behalf of the World Obesity Federation (2017) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12551 · Cited by 1,612
Bray, G. A., Frühbeck, G., Ryan, D. H., & Wilding, J. P. H. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00271-3 · Cited by 1,036
Weintraub, W. S., Daniels, S. R., Burke, L. E., Franklin, B. A., Goff, D. C., Hayman, L. L., Lloyd-Jones, D., Pandey, D. K., Sanchez, E. J., Schram, A. P., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182285a81 · Cited by 541
Alonso, J., Petukhova, M., Vilagut, G., Chatterji, S., Heeringa, S., Üstün, T. B., Alhamzawi, A. O., Viana, M. C., Angermeyer, M., Bromet, E., et al. (2011) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.101 · Cited by 482
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Loeppke, R., Taitel, M., Haufle, V., Parry, T., Kessler, R. C., & Jinnett, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 411-428
- ISSN
- 1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028192671
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health and Productivity as a Business Strategy: A Multiemployer Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/jom.0b013e3181a39180
- The paper
- Loeppke, R., Taitel, M., Haufle, V., Parry, T., Kessler, R. C., & Jinnett, K. (2009). Health and Productivity as a Business Strategy: A Multiemployer Study. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e3181a39180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.