Epidemiology, pathophysiology, transmission, genomic structure, treatment, and future perspectives of the novel Marburg virus outbreak
Open accessAbstract
Dear Editor, Marburg virus disease (MVD) has been linked to two fatal cases in Ghana’s Ashanti region. These cases were reported to the appropriate health authorities on June 28, 2022, as suspected cases of viral hemorrhagic fever, and on July 1, 2022, Marburg virus (MARV) testing was positive. This is the first time MVD has been made known in Ghana, and there has only ever been one earlier outbreak of the disease reported in West Africa. An MVD outbreak could pose a significant risk to the public’s health because it is severe and frequently fatal1. Three laboratories in West Germany and Yugoslavia reported epidemics of a previously unidentified disease in 1967 that was characterized by high temperature, hemorrhaging, and organ failure2. The culprit responsible for the disease was later determined to be a new virus known as MARV, the first described member of the Filoviridae family3. The first documented instance of the illness outside of a lab was in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) in 1975. Cases of the illness were caused by MARV in 1980 and the Ravn virus, another MARV, in 19874. Recent outbreaks have been linked to higher pathogenicity and ~90% fatality in humans, compared to earlier outbreaks that were linked to 20–40% lethality5. Marburg hemorrhagic fever is a condition caused by MARV, which typically enters the body through damaged skin. Inadequate fluid transport, coagulation issues, shock, and multiorgan failures are the most severe clinical characteristics of MVD. Studies on MARV-infected monkeys indicate that macrophages, monocytes, and Kupffer cells are the main targets of MARV infection6. In order to cause cellular activation and damage to secondary targets, like endothelial cells, MARV predominantly targets mononuclear phagocytic cells, such as monocytes and macrophages. Shock, which accelerates the development of cytokines and other proinflammatory mediators by activated macrophages and monocytes, is the primary cause of death in MVD7,8. Investigations are underway to find out how the virus first spread from its animal host to people. Transmission occurs through interpersonal interaction and many factors, such as (1) Direct contact with any of the following, including cuts, scrapes, or the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, or mouth, might cause the virus to spread. (2) Blood or bodily fluids from an MVD patient or patient who has passed away from it, including urine, perspiration, feces, vomit, breast milk, amniotic fluid, and semen. (3) Products that have been contaminated with the MVD patient’s or the deceased person’s bodily fluids, such as clothing, bedding, needles, and medical supplies. (4) Another is sperm from an MVD survivor, such as through oral, vaginal, or anal sex. After MVD recovery, even though a patient no longer displays acute disease symptoms, the virus may still be present in some body fluids (including semen). There is no evidence that engaging with or touching a woman’s vaginal fluids while she is infected with MVD can transfer MARV9,10. The MARV genome is composed of inversely complementary 3′ and 5′ termini and is negative sense single-stranded (-ssRNA), linear, and nonsegmented. The genome does not have a 5′ cap and is not 3′ polyadenylated. About ~19 kb make up the MARV genome. The genome contains seven genes: 3′-UTR-NP-VP35-VP40-GP1-GP2-VP30-VP24-L-5′-UTR11. Highly conserved transcriptions start and stop codon locations make up each gene of the MARV. Each gene contains a 3′OH, an open reading frame, and a 5′ untranslated region. These genes are separated by brief intergenic regions that range in length from 4 to 97 nucleotides. Using five highly conserved nucleotides, the transcription turns off the signal of the upstream gene and turns on the signal of the downstream gene12. Seven structural proteins make up the MARV genome, and each one of them makes a unique contribution to the genome. Nucleotide proteins are required for the processes of replication, transcription, RNA genome encapsulation, nucleocapsid synthesis, and budding13. While viron protein 40 promotes budding and prevents interferons signaling, viron protein 35 serves as a cofactor for the polymerase, an interferons antagonist, and promotes the production of nucleocapsids. Nucleocapsid formation is a function of viron protein 30, whereas nucleocapsid maturation is a function of viron protein 24. Surface-bound budding glycoprotein facilitates fusion, receptor binding, and attachment. The tail L gene affects the activity of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase14. Several drugs for MARV infection have been the subjects of recent trials. Remdesivir is a crucial medication that requires additional research after a recent study on it against MARV revealed that it has therapeutic efficacy in cynomolgus macaque models. According to the study, it was therapeutically effective when given once daily in a vehicle in 4 or 5 days after the immunization, for 12 days at a dose of 5 mg/kg, or for 10 days at a dose of 10 mg/kg loading
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human-to-human transmission of MVD has been observed, primarily in household or healthcare settings with lack of infection protection and control measures, for example via contact with bodily fluids.
“Human-to-human transmission has also been observed, primarily occurring in household or healthcare settings with a lack of infection protection and control measures, for example via contact with bodily fluids from an MVD patient (15,16).”
From Marburg virus disease outbreaks, mathematical models, and disease parameters: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The paper’s transmission discussion (page unavailable) describes interpersonal spread through contact with an MVD patient’s blood or bodily fluids. It does not say transmission occurs primarily in households or healthcare settings, or link those settings to inadequate infection prevention and control measures. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [1]Sah R Mohanty A Reda A. Marburg virus re-emerged in 2022: recently detected in Ghana, another zoonotic pathogen coming up amid rising cases of Monkeypox and ongoing COVID-19 pandemic-global health concerns and counteracting measures. Vet Q 2022; 42: 1– 9. 35993230 PMC9448384
- [2]Slenczka W. The Marburg virus outbreak of 1967 and subsequent episodes. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1999; 235: 49– 75. 9893378
- [3]Siegert R Shu H-L Slenczka W. On the etiology of an unknown human infection originating from monkeys. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1967; 92: 2341– 2343. 4294540
- [4]Conrad JL Isaacson M Smith EB. Epidemiologic investigation of Marburg virus disease, Southern Africa, 1975. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1978; 27: 1210– 1215. 569445
- [5]Towner JS Khristova ML Sealy TK. Marburgvirus genomics and association with a large hemorrhagic fever outbreak in Angola. J Virol 2006; 80: 6497– 6516. 16775337 PMC1488971
- [6]Hensley LE Alves DA Geisbert JB. Pathogenesis of Marburg hemorrhagic fever in cynomolgus macaques. J Infect Dis 2011; 204: S1021– S1031. 21987738
- [7]Aronson JF Armando E. Fraire. Viral hemorrhagic fevers. Viruses and the Lung. Springer; 2014: 123– 132.
- [8]Gear JS Cassel G Gear A. Outbreake of Marburg virus disease in Johannesburg. Br Med J 1975; 4: 489– 493. 811315 PMC1675587
- [9]Rai SN Tiwari N Singh P. Exploring the paradox of COVID-19 in neurological complications with emphasis on Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022; 2022: 1– 16. PMC9453010 36092161
- [10]Swanepoel R Smit SB Rollin PE. Studies of reservoir hosts for Marburg virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13: 1847. 18258034 PMC2876776
- [11]Kiley M Bowen E Eddy G. Filoviridae: a taxonomic home for Marburg and Ebola viruses? Intervirology 1982; 18: 24– 32. 7118520
- [12]Fauquet CM Mayo MA Maniloff J. Virus Taxonomy: VIIIth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic Press; 2005.
- [13]DiCarlo A Möller P Lander A. Nucleocapsid formation and RNA synthesis of Marburg virus is dependent on two coiled coil motifs in the nucleoprotein. Virol J 2007; 4: 1– 8. 17958906 PMC2170442
- [14]Mühlberger E Weik M Volchkov VE. Comparison of the transcription and replication strategies of Marburg virus and Ebola virus by using artificial replication systems. J Virol 1999; 73: 2333– 2342. 9971816 PMC104478
- [15]Porter DP Weidner JM Gomba L. Remdesivir (GS-5734) is efficacious in cynomolgus macaques infected with Marburg virus. J Infect Dis 2020; 222: 1894– 1901. 32479636
- [16]Zhang L Lei S Xie H. Screening and identification of Marburg virus entry inhibitors using approved drugs. Virol Sin 2020; 35: 235– 239. 31863356 PMC7198659
- [17]Han Z Ye H Liang J. Compound FC-10696 inhibits egress of Marburg virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65: e00086-21. 33846137 PMC8218653
- [18]Heald AE Charleston JS Iversen PL. AVI-7288 for Marburg virus in nonhuman primates and humans. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 339– 348. 26200980
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marburg virus disease outbreaks, mathematical models, and disease parameters: a systematic review
Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., McCain, K., McCabe, R., Unwin, H. J. T., Doohan, P., Nash, R. K., Hicks, J. T., Charniga, K., Geismar, C., Lambert, B., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00515-7 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Human-to-human transmission has also been observed, primarily occurring in household or healthcare settings with a lack of infection protection and control measures, for example via contact with bodily fluids from an MVD patient (15,16).”
- Authors
- Islam, M. R., Akash, S., Rahman, M. M., & Sharma, R.
- Affiliations
- Daffodil International University (BD)
- Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Islam, Md Rezaul
- Akash, Shopnil
- Rahman, Md Mominur
- Venue
- International Journal of Surgery
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-38
- ISSN
- 1743-9159 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9191
- PMC
- PMC10389455
- OpenAlex
- W4321169239
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
- Keywords
- Marburg virus disease, Marburg virus, filoviruses, viral hemorrhagic fever, pathophysiology, virus transmission, zoonotic transmission, genome structure, antiviral therapy, macrophage infection, cytokine storm, epidemic preparedness, public health response, West Africa, Ashanti Region, Ghana
- MeSH terms
- Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Genomics, Marburgvirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review