Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subtyping of Undifferentiated Non-small Cell Carcinomas in Bronchial Biopsy Specimens

Open access
Loo, Peh Sun, Thomas, Stuart C., Nicolson, Marianne C., Fyfe, Margaret N., Kerr, Keith M.·2010·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

Introduction: The emergence of treatments for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with differential efficacy and toxicity between subtypes has highlighted the importance of specific pathologic NSCLC subtyping. Most NSCLCs are inoperable, and pathologic diagnosis is made only on small tissue samples that are prone to diagnostic inaccuracy. In a substantial proportion of cases, standard morphology cannot specifically subtype the tumor, necessitating a diagnosis of NSCLC-not otherwise specified (NOS). Histochemical staining for mucin and immunohistochemical (IHC) identification of NSCLC subtype-associated markers could help predict the final subtype of resected NSCLCs diagnosed as NSCLC-NOS on preoperative bronchial biopsy samples. Methods: Paraffin sections of 44 bronchial biopsy samples diagnosed as NSCLC-NOS were stained for mucin (Alcian blue/periodic acid Schiff) and thyroid transcription factor 1 by IHC–(markers of adenocarcinoma), and for S100A7, cytokeratin 5/6, high molecular weight cytokeratins, and p63 proteins–markers of squamous cell carcinoma. A predictive staining panel was derived from statistical analysis after comparing staining profiles with the final postsurgical NSCLC subtype. This panel was prospectively applied to 82 small biopsy samples containing NSCLC. Results: True NSCLC subtype of undifferentiated NSCLC samples was best predicted using Alcian blue/periodic acid Schiff plus p63 and thyroid transcription factor 1 IHC, allowing specific subtyping in 73% of NSCLC-NOS cases with 86% accuracy. When applied prospectively, this staining panel showed 100% concordance with specific NSCLC morphologic subtyping in small biopsies. Conclusion: This approach can facilitate treatment selection by accurately predicting the subtype in undifferentiated NSCLC biopsies, reducing to 7% the proportion of cases without a definite or probable histologic subtype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jto.0b013e3181d40fac

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Loo, P. S., Thomas, S. C., Nicolson, M. C., Fyfe, M. N., & Kerr, K. M.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
442-447
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002446391
Cited by
226
References
3
FWCI
26.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subtyping of Undifferentiated Non-small Cell Carcinomas in Bronchial Biopsy Specimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/jto.0b013e3181d40fac
The paper
Loo, P. S., Thomas, S. C., Nicolson, M. C., Fyfe, M. N., & Kerr, K. M. (2010). Subtyping of Undifferentiated Non-small Cell Carcinomas in Bronchial Biopsy Specimens. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0b013e3181d40fac

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.