Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment-by-Histology Interaction Analyses in Three Phase III Trials Show Superiority of Pemetrexed in Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Scagliotti, Giorgio, Brodowicz, Thomas, Shepherd, Frances A., Zielinski, Christoph, Vansteenkiste, Johan, Manegold, Christian, Simms, Lorinda, Fossella, Frank, Sugarman, Katherine, Belani, Chandra P.·2011·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, histology has emerged as a predictive factor for pemetrexed efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These analyses evaluate whether the differential efficacy of pemetrexed by NSCLC histology is reproducible and consistent across three registration studies of different lines of therapy (first-line/second-line and maintenance settings). Methods: The reported studies for patients with advanced NSCLC were pemetrexed versus docetaxel in previously treated patients (N = 571), cisplatin plus pemetrexed versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients (N = 1725), and maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care (N = 663). Cox models of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used to test for a significant treatment-by-histology interaction (THI). A significant THI indicates that the efficacy benefit for pemetrexed relative to the control arm is greater in patients with nonsquamous histology than in those with squamous histology. Subsequent Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios for OS and PFS according to histology. Results: Histology was well balanced between treatment arms in each study. Across all three studies, no clinically relevant differences were observed for the safety profile of pemetrexed among histologic groups. THIs were statistically significant in all three studies for OS (p = 0.001, 0.002, and 0.033, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.004, 0.002, and 0.036, respectively). Conclusions: These analyses demonstrate a statistically significant interaction between treatment effect and NSCLC histology, indicating superior efficacy of pemetrexed in nonsquamous patients compared with other standard treatment options. Thus, histology is consistently predictive of the improved efficacy of pemetrexed in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jto.0b013e3181f7c6d4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Scagliotti, G., Brodowicz, T., Shepherd, F. A., Zielinski, C., Vansteenkiste, J., Manegold, C., Simms, L., Fossella, F., Sugarman, K., & Belani, C. P.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
64-70
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156728903
Cited by
252
References
5
FWCI
23.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment-by-Histology Interaction Analyses in Three Phase III Trials Show Superiority of Pemetrexed in Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/jto.0b013e3181f7c6d4
The paper
Scagliotti, G., Brodowicz, T., Shepherd, F. A., Zielinski, C., Vansteenkiste, J., Manegold, C., Simms, L., Fossella, F., Sugarman, K., & Belani, C. P. (2011). Treatment-by-Histology Interaction Analyses in Three Phase III Trials Show Superiority of Pemetrexed in Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0b013e3181f7c6d4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.