Cited by 10Medical Coding and Health InformationChronic Disease Management StrategiesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of social determinants of health codes in home-based primary care

Coppa, Denise, Winchester, Suzy Barcelos, McAlvin, Elizabeth, Roberts, Mary B., Maestri, Xristin·2022·Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

Abstract

Background: The Affordable Care Act created funding for nurse practitioner education programs to transform the primary health care workforce through student awareness of how social, political, economic, and environmental factors influence individual and population health. Funding established Academic Clinical Partnerships (ACPs) that created value-based health care models, which improved patient outcomes and decreased hospital and emergency department admissions and health care costs. The ACP established a home-based primary health care (HBPC) program to deliver primary care and collect patient data. Purpose: The purposes were to describe the incidence of chronic conditions for HBPC patients and determine associations between chronic conditions and presence of social determinants of health (SDoH). Methodology: Nurse practitioner students were assigned to HBPC clinical placements. A convenience sample of 102 high-risk, homebound patients was identified. Nurse practitioners and students recorded deidentified patient data, including ICD-10 -CM codes into a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant platform. Secondary analysis of patient records assessed for SDoH through Z codes. Results: Patients had high incidences of hypertension, diabetes, pulmonary disease, heart disease, chronic pain, mood, and substance abuse disorders. Secondary analysis revealed that 92% of patients had indications for the use of Z codes, but these were not recorded. Conclusions: Common Z codes were personal risk factors, housing/economic circumstances, care provider dependency, lifestyle, and family support. Implications for practice: By coding for SDoH, providers and agencies can realize higher reimbursement rates in HBPC settings. Nurse practitioners can use this information to provide better treatment recommendations, more accurate diagnoses, and referrals to enhance primary care services to a patient population negatively affected by SDoH.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jxx.0000000000000586

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Arons, 2019, Documenting social determinants of health-related clinical activities using standardized medical vocabularies, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 2, 81
  2. Bhatt, 2018, Ensuring access to quality health care in vulneable communities, Academic Medicine, 93, 1271, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002254 · DOI
  3. Clevenger, 2018, Creating new models of care through academic-clinical partnerships, Nursing Administration Quarterly, 42, 305, 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000320 · DOI
  4. Cockerham, 2017, The social determinants of chronic disease, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52, S5, 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Davis, 2017, Prevalence of single and multiple leading causes of death by race/ethnicity among people aged 60 to 70 years, Preventing Chronic Disease, 14, 160241, 10.5888/pcd14.160241 · DOI
  6. Fink-Samnick, 2018, Managing the social determinants of health: Part II. Leveraging assessment toward comprehensive case management, Professional Case Management, 23, 240, 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000308 · DOI
  7. Golden, 2015, Upending the social ecological model to guide health promotion efforts toward policy and environmental change, Health, Education and Behavior, 42, 8S, 10.1177/1090198115575098 · DOI
  8. Heron, 2018, Deaths: Leading causes for 2016, National Vital Statistics Reports, 67, 1
  9. Lewis, 2016, Community health center provider ability to identify, treat and account for social determinants of health: A card study, BMC Family Practice, 17, 121, 10.1186/s12875-016-0526-8 · DOI
  10. Melis, 2014, Incidence and predictors of multimorbidity in the elderly: A population‐based longitudinal study, PLoS One, 9, e103120, 10.1371/journal.pone.0103120 · DOI
  11. Northwood, 2018, Integrative review of the social determinants of health in older adults with multimorbidity, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74, 45, 10.1111/jan.13408 · DOI
  12. Ornstein, 2015, The epidemiology of the homebound in the United States, JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 1180, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1849 · DOI
  13. Vasilopoulos, 2014, Comorbidity and chronic conditions in the national social life, health and aging project (NSHAP), wave 2, Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 154, 10.1093/geronb/gbu025 · DOI
  14. Wold, 2018, Health promotion research over three decades: The social-ecological model and challenges in implementation of interventions, ScandinavianJournal of Public Health, 46, 20
  15. Wright, 2018, Leveraging graduate academic-practice partnerships to transform health system outcomes, Nursing Administration Quarterly, 42, 324, 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000311 · DOI
  16. Coppa, 2020, Content evaluation of social determinants of health and cultural fluency to measure nurse practitioner application in clinical siuations, International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 58, 124, 10.1080/14635240.2020.1719863 · DOI
  17. Coppa, 2018, Home-based nurse practitioners demonstrate reduction in rehospitalizations and emergency department visits in a clinically complex patient population through an academic-clinical partnership, Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 30, 335, 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000060 · DOI
  18. Yao, 2017, Increasing role of nurse practitioners in house call programs, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65, 847, 10.1111/jgs.14698 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Coppa, D., Winchester, S. B., McAlvin, E., Roberts, M. B., & Maestri, X.
Affiliations
University of Rhode Island (US)
Corresponding author
Coppa, Denise
Venue
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
42-49
ISSN
  • 2327-6886 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-6924
OpenAlex
W3137012820
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
social determinants of health, home-based primary care, Z codes, ICD-10-CM coding, chronic disease, nurse practitioner education, academic-clinical partnership, Affordable Care Act, homebound patients, reimbursement, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, substance use disorders, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Aged, Home Care Services, Humans, Primary Health Care, United States, Homebound Persons, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review