Cited by 66Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

A Prospective, Multi-Centered Study of the Treatment of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss With Combination Therapy Versus High-Dose Prednisone Alone: A 139 Patient Follow-up

Battaglia, Alex, Lualhati, Annette, Lin, Harrison, Burchette, Raoul, Cueva, Roberto·2014·Otology & Neurotology

Abstract

Objective To compare combination therapy (high-dose prednisone taper (HDPT) + intratympanic dexamethasone (IT-Dex)) hearing recovery results in ISSNHL patients with those treated with HDPT alone. Design Prospective, multicentered trial. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Eighty ISSNHL patients with class C or D hearing. Intervention Eighty qualifying patients were treated with IT-Dex (10 mg/ml) every week for 3 weeks concomitant with HDPT (60 mg/d for 7 d with 7-d taper) and followed prospectively. Main outcome measure(s) Four-tone pure tone average (PTA) at 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz and speech discrimination scores (SDS) 2 months posttreatment; Hearing results compared retrospectively with those of 59 ISSNHL treated with HDPT alone. Results Combination therapy and HDPT alone both provided a statistically significant benefit in audiometric parameters, especially if treated within 7 days of onset. However, 49% versus 29% (p = 0.02) of class D patients receiving combination therapy versus HDPT achieved serviceable hearing. Patients receiving combination therapy versus HDPT experienced a significantly greater improvement in PTA (34.1 ± 27 dB versus 12.0 ± 21 dB; p Conclusion Combination therapy offers ISSNHL patients the highest likelihood of achieving class A and B hearing. Differential results with combination therapy and HDPT compared with previous studies suggest time- and dose-dependent responses to the treatment of ISSNHL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0000000000000450

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Battaglia, A., Lualhati, A., Lin, H., Burchette, R., & Cueva, R.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
  • Battaglia, Alex
  • Lualhati, Annette
  • Lin, Harrison
  • Cueva, Roberto
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2014-07
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1091-1098
ISSN
1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086529610
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, combination therapy, high-dose prednisone, intratympanic dexamethasone, hearing recovery, pure-tone average, speech discrimination, treatment timing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Dexamethasone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Follow-Up Studies, Glucocorticoids, Hearing, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Middle Aged, Prednisone, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review