Cited by 14Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tinnitus affects speech in noise comprehension in individuals with hearing loss.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is a prevalent auditory disorder that frequently co-occurs with hearing loss. It is suggested that tinnitus might have negative impact on speech perception. However, studies thus far have not been able to disentangle tinnitus, hearing loss, and speech in noise intelligibility. We therefore investigated whether there is an association between tinnitus and speech understanding in noise, independent of hearing loss. METHODS: Of 4,211 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study (mean age 67.8 [SD 8.9], 57.3% female) data was available on tinnitus, pure-tone audiometry, and digits in noise test. We compared the speech reception threshold in noise (SRTn) in participants with and without tinnitus for the whole population as well as for subgroups stratified for average hearing threshold in 10-dB strata. Additionally, we regressed tinnitus on SRTn with a multivariable regression model, adjusting for sex, age, highest achieved education, and cognitive function. RESULTS: Participants with tinnitus (20.8%) had a higher SRTn (-3.6 dB [SD 3.7] versus -4.6 dB [SD 3.1]). This difference remained only in the subgroups of participants with hearing loss, between 0.6 and 0.8 dB difference in the SRTn for the different subgroups. In the fully adjusted model tinnitus was associated with 0.2 dB (95% CI 0.00, 0.39) SRTn increase. CONCLUSION: We have shown that tinnitus is associated with speech intelligibility in noise, but it is a small effect, only found in people with co-occurring hearing loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0000000000002733

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Oosterloo, B. C., Homans, N. C., & Goedegebure, A.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
Corresponding author
  • Oosterloo, Berthe C.
  • Homans, Nienke C.
  • Goedegebure, André
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
e1074-e1081
ISSN
  • 1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4505
OpenAlex
W3033030489
Cited by
14
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
tinnitus, hearing loss, speech perception in noise, speech reception threshold, speech intelligibility, older adults, Rotterdam Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Auditory Threshold, Female, Humans, Male, Noise, Speech Perception, Speech Reception Threshold Test, Tinnitus, Comprehension, Hearing Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review