Cited by 178Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Prognostic model for predicting hearing recovery in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Čvorović, Ljiljana, Đeric, Dragoslava, Probst, Rudolf, Hegemann, Stefan·2008·Otology & Neurotology

Abstract

Hypothesis To aid in realistic counseling of patients at the time of their first visit concerning their chances for recovery, we created a simple prognostic model for predicting hearing recovery in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). Background An important element of research on ISSHL is to identify prognostic factors for this disease. Many studies have described predictive indicators to identify patients with a good prognosis needing no or minimal treatment. Only a few of these studies have included a model for calculating the probability for patient recovery, which may be important for clinical work, but these prognostic tables have not achieved widespread use clinically. Methods Evaluation of an electronic patient data base of 541 patients with ISSHL. The standard treatment was carbogen inhalation (95% O2 and 5% CO2 8 times per day in duration of 30 min) and prednisone orally (100 mg in 1 morning dose) for 7 days. Factors that were analyzed included the patient's age, the interval between the onset of symptoms and beginning of treatment, the presence or absence of vertigo and tinnitus, audiometric patterns, the severity of hearing loss, and hearing in the opposite ear. Hearing gain was expressed either as absolute hearing gain or as relative hearing gain. Significant recovery of hearing was defined as the final pure-tone audiometry of 30 dB or less (or the same as the pure-tone audiometry of the opposite ear). Results The absolute hearing gain was 15.1 d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0b013e31816fdcb4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Čvorović, L., Đeric, D., Probst, R., & Hegemann, S.
Affiliations
  • Zemun Hospital (RS)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Čvorović, Ljiljana
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2008-06
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
464-469
ISSN
1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061118057
Cited by
178
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, hearing recovery, prognostic model, vertigo, time to treatment, contralateral hearing, carbogen inhalation, prednisone, pure tone audiometry, patient counseling, prognostic factors, tinnitus
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Carbon Dioxide, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Predictive Value of Tests, Prednisone, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Tinnitus, Vertigo, Models, Statistical, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review