Cited by 40Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Recurrence Rate of Idiopathic Sudden Low-Tone Sensorineural Hearing Loss Without Vertigo: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Fushiki, Hiroaki, Junicho, Makiko, Aso, Shin, Watanabe, Yukio·2009·Otology & Neurotology

Abstract

Objective Among the types of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, low-tone type without vertigo has attracted attention for its recurrence and progression to Ménière's disease. The purpose of this article is to characterize the recurrent type of sudden low-tone sensorineural hearing loss without vertigo using neuro-otologic examination. Study design Retrospective. Setting Tertiary referral center. Interventions Diagnostic and prognostic. Methods Long-term follow-up of 82 patients diagnosed at the university hospital with idiopathic sudden low-tone sensorineural hearing loss without vertigo. The recurrence rate was determined according to results of electronystagmography (ENG) and electrocochleography (ECochG) tests at the onset of the first episode of hearing loss. Results Forty percent of the patients experienced recurrent hearing loss. Among the patients who experienced recurrence, 45% had a recurrence within 6 months from the first episode of hearing loss. The recurrence rate varied largely according to the results of the ENG and ECochG tests. In patients with an elevated ratio of the summating potential to the action potential and spontaneous nystagmus on ENG, the recurrence rate was 78.6%. However, in those with a normal ratio of the summating potential to the action potential and without spontaneous nystagmus, the recurrence rate was 31.8%. Conclusion Our results indicate that idiopathic sudden low-tone sensorineural hearing loss without vertigo has a high recu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0b013e31819d3496

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fushiki, H., Junicho, M., Aso, S., & Watanabe, Y.
Affiliations
University of Toyama (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Fushiki, Hiroaki
  • Junicho, Makiko
  • Watanabe, Yukio
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2009-04
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
295-298
ISSN
1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067750365
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
recurrence rate, endolymphatic hydrops, spontaneous nystagmus, electrocochleography, electronystagmography, vestibular dysfunction, prognosis
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Electronystagmography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Meniere Disease, Middle Aged, Nystagmus, Pathologic, Prognosis, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Vertigo, Endolymphatic Hydrops, Disease Progression, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review