Cited by 87Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Risk of Developing Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Diabetic Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Lin, Shih-Wei, Lin, Yung-Song, Weng, Shih-Feng, Chou, Chien-Wen·2012·Otology & Neurotology

Abstract

Objectives To explore the risk of development of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) among diabetes mellitus patients. Study design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Population-based study of Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients Approximately 26,556 newly diagnosed diabetic patients and 26,556 comparison subjects without diabetes mellitus were selected from claims made during 2000 to 2004. Main outcome measures The incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) at the end of 2009 was determined. Results The incidence of SSHL was 1.54-fold higher in the diabetic group compared with the nondiabetic group (1.29 versus 0.78 per 1,000 person-years), and using Cox proportional hazard regressions, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.592 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.295-1.957). The risk of developing SSHL increased substantially to an HR of 2.060 (95% CI, 1.051-4.037), for patients who required triple antidiabetic medication compared with diabetic patients treated with a single antidiabetic drug. An increased risk of developing SSHL, with adjusted HRs of 1.574 (95% CI, 1.091-2.271) and 2.842 (95% CI, 1.880-4.295), was observed in diabetic patients with newly diagnosed comorbidities of retinopathy or retinopathy combined with renal insufficiency, which are both expected to reflect the severity of diabetes. Conclusion Diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing SSHL. Coronary heart disease or retinopat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0b013e318271397a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, S.-W., Lin, Y.-S., Weng, S.-F., & Chou, C.-W.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
  • Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Shih-Wei
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2012-12
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1482-1488
ISSN
1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971468581
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
sudden sensorineural hearing loss, diabetes mellitus, diabetic patients, antidiabetic drugs, diabetic retinopathy, renal failure, coronary artery disease, diabetes severity, incidence, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Population, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Taiwan, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review