Endolymphatic Hydrops Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Low-Tone Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Open accessAbstract
Objective Acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss (ALHL) has been reported to be associated with endolymphatic hydrops (EHs). However, evaluation of the size of the endolymphatic space has not been reported. We attempted to visualize EH in ALHL using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study design Prospective diagnostic study. Setting University hospital. Methods We evaluated 25 ears of 25 unilateral ALHL patients. Three-tesla MRI was obtained 24 hours after intratympanic injection of gadolinium (Gd) (n = 5) or 4 hours after intravenous injection of Gd (n = 20). A radiologist blinded to the patients' clinical data classified the degree of EH in the vestibule and cochlea into 3 groups: none, mild, and significant. Results On the affected sides, cochlear EH was recognized in 23 ears (92%) and was classified as significant EH (n = 15) or mild EH (n = 8); vestibular EH was detected in 22 ears (88%), classified as significant EH (n = 16) or mild EH (n = 6). Cochlear EH was more frequently observed in the affected ear than in the contralateral ear (90% versus 40%, p Conclusion In ALHL, EH was observed not only in the cochlea but also in the vestibule as in Ménière's disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shimono et al. reported a 92% prevalence rate of cochlear endolymphatic hydrops in patients with ALHL based on 3-Tesla MRI.
“Shimono et al. 21 reported a 92% prevalence rate of cochlear endolymphatic hydrops in patients with ALHL based on 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).”
From Recurrent sudden sensorineural hearing loss—A literature review (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recurrent sudden sensorineural hearing loss—A literature review
Zhang, B., Wang, Y., & Chan, K. (2022) · Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/lio2.828 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shimono, M., Teranishi, M., Yoshida, T., Kato, M., Sano, R., Otake, H., Kato, K., Sone, M., Ohmiya, N., Naganawa, S., & Nakashima, T.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Chubu Rosai Hospital (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Shimono, Mariko
- Teranishi, Masaaki
- Yoshida, Tadao
- Kato, Masahiro
- Otake, Hironao
- Kato, Ken
- Sone, Michihiko
- Nakashima, Tsutomu
- ORCID
- Venue
- Otology & Neurotology
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1241-1246
- ISSN
- 1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2281842476
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Nagoya University Repository (NAGOYA Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24659562, 25293263, 25861548)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- endolymphatic hydrops, magnetic resonance imaging, gadolinium enhancement, Meniere's disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Audiometry, Cochlea, Contrast Media, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Meniere Disease, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Endolymphatic Hydrops, Gadolinium DTPA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review