Cited by 79Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Endolymphatic Hydrops Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Low-Tone Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Open access
Shimono, Mariko, Teranishi, Masaaki, Yoshida, Tadao, Kato, Masahiro, Sano, Rui, Otake, Hironao, Kato, Ken, Sone, Michihiko +3 more·2013·Otology & Neurotology

Abstract

Objective Acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss (ALHL) has been reported to be associated with endolymphatic hydrops (EHs). However, evaluation of the size of the endolymphatic space has not been reported. We attempted to visualize EH in ALHL using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study design Prospective diagnostic study. Setting University hospital. Methods We evaluated 25 ears of 25 unilateral ALHL patients. Three-tesla MRI was obtained 24 hours after intratympanic injection of gadolinium (Gd) (n = 5) or 4 hours after intravenous injection of Gd (n = 20). A radiologist blinded to the patients' clinical data classified the degree of EH in the vestibule and cochlea into 3 groups: none, mild, and significant. Results On the affected sides, cochlear EH was recognized in 23 ears (92%) and was classified as significant EH (n = 15) or mild EH (n = 8); vestibular EH was detected in 22 ears (88%), classified as significant EH (n = 16) or mild EH (n = 6). Cochlear EH was more frequently observed in the affected ear than in the contralateral ear (90% versus 40%, p Conclusion In ALHL, EH was observed not only in the cochlea but also in the vestibule as in Ménière's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0b013e3182990e81

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shimono et al. reported a 92% prevalence rate of cochlear endolymphatic hydrops in patients with ALHL based on 3-Tesla MRI.

    “Shimono et al. 21 reported a 92% prevalence rate of cochlear endolymphatic hydrops in patients with ALHL based on 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimono, M., Teranishi, M., Yoshida, T., Kato, M., Sano, R., Otake, H., Kato, K., Sone, M., Ohmiya, N., Naganawa, S., & Nakashima, T.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Chubu Rosai Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Shimono, Mariko
  • Teranishi, Masaaki
  • Yoshida, Tadao
  • Kato, Masahiro
  • Otake, Hironao
  • Kato, Ken
  • Sone, Michihiko
  • Nakashima, Tsutomu
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2013-09
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1241-1246
ISSN
1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2281842476
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Nagoya University Repository (NAGOYA Repository) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24659562, 25293263, 25861548)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
endolymphatic hydrops, magnetic resonance imaging, gadolinium enhancement, Meniere's disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Audiometry, Cochlea, Contrast Media, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Meniere Disease, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Endolymphatic Hydrops, Gadolinium DTPA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review