The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation protocols for blood pressure measuring devices: the impact of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol and the development of a Universal Standard
Abstract
In the last three decades protocols for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices have been developed by the US Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the British Hypertension Society, the German Hypertension League, the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure Monitoring and the International Organization for Standardization. The European Society of Hypertension International Protocol required much smaller sample size than the other protocols, aiming to reduce the time, resources and cost of validation studies and thereby increase the number of validated devices. Given its specifications, the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol was adequate for 'high- and low-accuracy' devices, yet assessment of 'moderate accuracy' devices had high uncertainty with resultant high rate of device failure. Thus, devices validated using the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol should be considered to be as accurate as those validated with the previous Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation or British Hypertension Society protocols. However, the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol did not allow subgroup evaluation (arm sizes, special populations, etc). The mission of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol to promote the concept of validation has been well achieved, as almost double studies have been published using it than all the other protocols together. However, the maintenance of different validation protocols is confusing and therefore experts from the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, European Society of Hypertension International Protocol and International Organization for Standardization have now developed the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) as the recommended 21st-century procedure for worldwide application. The European Society of Hypertension Working Group has published a practical guide for using the Universal Standard. It is in the interests of all scientific bodies to propagate the Universal Standard and ensure its wide implementation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most devices available on the market have not been subjected to independent validation using one of the established protocols.
“Unfortunately, most of the devices available on the market have not been subjected to independent validation using one of these protocols [69,87–89].”
The use of accurate devices is fundamental for the reliable evaluation of home blood pressure.
“As with all BP measurement methods, the use of accurate devices is fundamental for the reliable evaluation of HBP [87].”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- O’Brien, 2002, Working group on blood pressure monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults., Blood Press Monit, 7, 3, 10.1097/00126097-200202000-00002 · DOI
- O’Brien, 2010, European society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults., Blood Press Monit, 15, 23, 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283360e98 · DOI
- Stergiou, 2018, Improving the accuracy of blood pressure measurement: the influence of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP) for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices and future perspectives., J Hypertens, 36, 479, 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001635 · DOI
- Stergiou, 2018, A universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) collaboration statement., Hypertension, 71, 368, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473
Self-citationParati, G., Stergiou, G. S., Bilo, G., Kollias, A., Pengo, M., Ochoa, J. E., Agarwal, R., Asayama, K., Asmar, R., Burnier, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002922 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Brien, E., Stergiou, G., Palatini, P., Asmar, R., Ioannidis, J. P., Kollias, A., Lacy, P., McManus, R. J., Myers, M. G., Shennan, A., Wang, J., & Parati, G.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- King's College London (GB)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Blood Pressure Monitoring
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 163-166
- ISSN
- 1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946475827
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200201, NIHR-RP-02-12-015, RP-PG-1209-10051)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Keywords
- blood pressure measuring devices, ISO 81060-2:2018, measurement accuracy, sample size, hypertension monitoring, device failure
- MeSH terms
- Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, Societies, Medical, Blood Pressure Monitors, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review