Cited by 152Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury: a complex struggle against the biology of nature

Schouten, Joost W·2007·Current Opinion in Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose of review Translating the efficacy of neuroprotective agents in experimental traumatic brain injury to clinical benefit has proven an extremely complex and, to date, unsuccessful undertaking. The focus of this review is on neuroprotective agents that have recently been evaluated in clinical trials and are currently under clinical evaluation, as well as on those that appear promising and are likely to undergo clinical evaluation in the near future. Recent findings Excitatory neurotransmitter blockage and magnesium have recently been evaluated in phase III clinical trials, but showed no neuroprotective efficacy. Cyclosporin A, erythropoietin, progesterone and bradykinin antagonists are currently under clinical investigation, and appear promising. Summary Traumatic brain injury is a complex disease, and development of clinically effective neuroprotective agents is a difficult task. Experimental traumatic brain injury has provided numerous promising compounds, but to date these have not been translated into successful clinical trials. Continued research efforts are required to identify and test new neuroprotective agents, to develop a better understanding of the sequential activity of pathophysiologic mechanisms, and to improve the design and analysis of clinical trials, thereby optimizing chances for showing benefit in future clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mcc.0b013e3280895d5c

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More than 30 phase-III clinical trials have failed to improve secondary injury outcome measures after TBI despite preclinical evidence for successful pharmacologic intervention.

    “Despite preclinical studies providing evidence for successful pharmacologic intervention, more than 30 phase-III clinical trials have failed to improve secondary injury outcome measures after TBI (35–37).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schouten, J. W.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Schouten, Joost W
Venue
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Published
2007-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
134-142
ISSN
1070-5295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976422798
Cited by
152
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, neuroprotection, neuroprotective agents, clinical translation, magnesium, cyclosporine, erythropoietin, progesterone, bradykinin receptor antagonists, pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Bradykinin, Brain Injuries, Erythropoietin, Humans, Magnesium, Mitochondria, Nitric Oxide, Neurotransmitter Agents, Neuroprotective Agents, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review