A Full Solid Diet as the Initial Meal in Mild Acute Pancreatitis is Safe and Result in a Shorter Length of Hospitalization: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Abstract
Goals To compare the safety and length of hospitalization (LOH) between a full solid diet as the initial meal for refeeding after mild acute pancreatitis (AP) as compared with 2 other diets. Background In mild AP, the need for fat restriction during refeeding has not been studied. It was hypothesized that the reintroduction of oral feeding with a full solid diet after mild AP was safe and might result in a shorter LOH. Study Subjects with mild AP were randomized to receive 1 of 3 diets (clear liquid, soft, or full solid) as the initial meal during oral refeeding. Diet progression and hospital discharge were decided by the physicians that were not members of trial team. During hospital stay, patients were monitored for relapse of pain (primary endpoint), dietary intake, LOH (secondary endpoint), and 7 days postdischarge to record pain relapse rates. Results A total of 210 patients were included, 70 in each arm. On a per-protocol basis, there was no difference in pain relapse rates during refeeding between the 3 diet arms (P=0.80). Subjects initiated on a full solid diet consumed significantly more calories and fats on trial days 1 and 2 (P Conclusions Oral refeeding with a full solid diet in mild AP was well tolerated and resulted in a shorter LOH in patients without abdominal pain relapse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Starting early feeding with clear liquids, soft diet, low-fat diet, or solid food was shown to be safe in different RCTs.
“Starting early feeding with clear liquids, soft diet, low-fat diet,”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [199]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Moraes, J. M. M., Felga, G. E. G., Chebli, L. A., Franco, M. B., Gomes, C. A., Gaburri, P. D., Zanini, A., & Chebli, J. M. F.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 517-522
- ISSN
- 0192-0790 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010002300
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Keywords
- mild acute pancreatitis, oral refeeding, length of hospital stay, pain relapse, dietary fat intake, clear liquid diet, soft diet
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Dietary Fats, Double-Blind Method, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatitis, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Abdominal Pain, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review