Cited by 53Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Impact of nutritional status on body functioning in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and how to intervene

Open access
Aniwidyaningsih, Wahju, Varraso, Raphaëlle, Cano, Noel, Pison, Christophe·2008·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is the fifth leading cause of mortality in the world. This study reviews diet as a risk or protective factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mechanisms of malnutrition, undernutrition consequences on body functioning and how to modulate nutritional status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Different dietary factors (dietary pattern, foods, nutrients) have been associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the course of the disease. Mechanical disadvantage, energy imbalance, disuse muscle atrophy, hypoxemia, systemic inflammation and oxidative stress have been reported to cause systemic consequences such as cachexia and compromise whole body functioning. Nutritional intervention makes it possible to modify the natural course of the disease provided that it is included in respiratory rehabilitation combining bronchodilators optimization, infection control, exercise and, in some patients, correction of hypogonadism. SUMMARY: Diet, as a modifiable risk factor, appears more as an option to prevent and modify the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Reduction of mechanical disadvantage, physical training and anabolic agents should be used conjointly with oral nutrition supplements to overcome undernutrition and might change the prognosis of the disease in some cases. Major research challenges address the role of systemic inflammation and the best interventions for controlling it besides smoking cessation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0b013e3283023d37

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aniwidyaningsih, W., Varraso, R., Cano, N., & Pison, C.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Pison, Christophe
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2008-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
435-442
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080235813
Cited by
53
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nutritional status, malnutrition, cachexia, pulmonary rehabilitation, dietary intervention, energy imbalance, disuse atrophy, hypoxemia, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, oral nutritional supplements, anabolic agents, exercise training, hypogonadism
MeSH terms
Cachexia, Diet, Humans, Inflammation, Nutritional Status, Risk Factors, Oxidative Stress, Nutritional Support, Inflammation Mediators, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review