Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Epidemiology and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study

Open access
Muñoz, Patricia, Kestler, Martha, De Alarcon, Arístides, Miro, José María, Bermejo, Javier, Rodríguez-Abella, Hugo, Fariñas, Maria Carmen, Cobo Belaustegui, Manuel, Mestres, Carlos, Llinares, Pedro, Goenaga, Miguel, Navas, Enrique, Oteo, José Antonio, Tarabini, Paola, Bouza, Emilio·2015·Medicine

Abstract

The aim of the study was to describe the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics and identify the risk factors of short-term and 1-year mortality in a recent cohort of patients with infective endocarditis (IE).From January 2008, multidisciplinary teams have prospectively collected all consecutive cases of IE, diagnosed according to the Duke criteria, in 25 Spanish hospitals.Overall, 1804 patients were diagnosed. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 55-77), 68.0% were men, and 37.1% of the cases were nosocomial or health care-related IE. Gram-positive microorganisms accounted for 79.3% of the episodes, followed by Gram-negative (5.2%), fungi (2.4%), anaerobes (0.9%), polymicrobial infections (1.9%), and unknown etiology (9.1%). Heart surgery was performed in 44.2%, and in-hospital mortality was 28.8%. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were age, previous heart surgery, cerebrovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, Staphylococcus or Candida etiology, intracardiac complications, heart failure, and septic shock. The 1-year independent risk factors for mortality were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02), neoplasia (OR, 2.46), renal insufficiency (OR, 1.59), and heart failure (OR, 4.42). Surgery was an independent protective factor for 1-year mortality (OR, 0.44).IE remains a severe disease with a high rate of in-hospital (28.9%) and 1-year mortality (11.2%). Surgery was the only intervention that significantly reduced 1-year mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000001816

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Muñoz, P., Kestler, M., De Alarcon, A., Miro, J. M., Bermejo, J., Rodríguez-Abella, H., Fariñas, M. C., Cobo Belaustegui, M., Mestres, C., Llinares, P., Goenaga, M., Navas, E., Oteo, J. A., Tarabini, P., & Bouza, E.
Venue
Medicine
Published
2015-10
Volume
94
Issue
43
Pages
e1816
ISSN
0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1831894185
Cited by
213
References
5
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Epidemiology and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/md.0000000000001816
The paper
Muñoz, P., Kestler, M., De Alarcon, A., Miro, J. M., Bermejo, J., Rodríguez-Abella, H., Fariñas, M. C., Cobo Belaustegui, M., Mestres, C., Llinares, P., Goenaga, M., Navas, E., Oteo, J. A., Tarabini, P., & Bouza, E. (2015). Current Epidemiology and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000001816

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.