The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel KIAA0196 mutation in a Chinese patient with spastic paraplegia 8: A case report
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eight of eleven pathogenic SPG8 mutations are located in the central spectrin domain of strumpellin, and five of those are between residues 608 and 790.
“Eight of eleven mutations identified in SPG8 patients localize to the spectrin-repeat domain, suggesting that this region could be particularly critical for SPG8 pathogenesis (8, 25, 32).”
From Hereditary spastic paraplegia SPG8 mutations impair CAV1-dependent, integrin-mediated cell adhesion (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ichinose, 2016, Exome sequencing reveals a novel missense mutation in the KIAA0196 gene in a Japanese patient with SPG8, Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 144, 36, 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.02.031 · DOI · Paper page
- Jahic, 2015, The spectrum of KIAA0196 variants, and characterization of a murine knockout: implications for the mutational mechanism in hereditary spastic paraplegia type SPG8, Orphanet J Rare Dis, 10, 147, 10.1186/s13023-015-0359-x · DOI · Paper page
- Chrestian, 2017, Clinical and genetic study of hereditary spastic paraplegia in Canada, Neurol Genet, 3, e122, 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000122 · DOI
- Valdmanis, 2007, Mutations in the KIAA0196 gene at the SPG8 locus cause hereditary spastic paraplegia, Am J Hum Genet, 80, 152, 10.1086/510782 · DOI · Paper page
- Gasser, 2010, EFNS guidelines on the molecular diagnosis of ataxias and spastic paraplegias, Eur J Neurol, 17, 179, 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02873.x · DOI
- Jahic, 2014, A novel strumpellin mutation and potential pitfalls in the molecular diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia type SPG8, J Neurol Sci, 347, 372, 10.1016/j.jns.2014.10.018 · DOI
- Elliott, 2013, A novel mutation in KIAA0196: identification of a gene involved in Ritscher-Schinzel/3C syndrome in a First Nations cohort, J Med Genet, 50, 819, 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101715 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hereditary spastic paraplegia SPG8 mutations impair CAV1-dependent, integrin-mediated cell adhesion
Lee, S., Park, H., Zhu, P.-P., Jung, S.-Y., Blackstone, C., & Chang, J. (2020) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aau7500 · Cited by 22
Case report: A novel WASHC5 variant altering mRNA splicing causes spastic paraplegia in a patient
Gao, S.-Y., Liu, Y.-X., Dong, Y., Fan, L.-L., Ding, Q., & Liu, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1205052 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, L., Shi, Y., Chen, Z., Li, S., Qin, W., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Medicine
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- e10760
- ISSN
- 0025-7974
- PMC
- PMC5976306
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review